Fountain Hills Awards Solid Waste Contract to Newcomer Universal Waste Systems Over Republic Services in 5–2 Vote; Procedural Challenges Cloud Narrow Decision
FOUNTAIN HILLS, ARIZONA — February 18, 2026

Fountain Hills Awards Solid Waste Contract to Newcomer Universal Waste Systems Over Republic Services in 5–2 Vote; Procedural Challenges Cloud Narrow Decision

Fountain Hills council voted 5-2 to award solid waste contract to Universal Waste Systems over 15-year incumbent Republic Services in a narrow, contested decision with public concerns about bid completeness and vendor qualifications; approved downtown facade improvement grant program and other routine business.


Fountain Hills Awards Solid Waste Contract to Newcomer Universal Waste Systems Over Republic Services in 5–2 Vote; Procedural Challenges Cloud Narrow Decision

On February 18, 2026, the Fountain Hills town council voted 5–2 to award the municipal solid waste services contract to Universal Waste Systems, ending Republic Services' 15-year tenure and triggering immediate criticism over bid completeness, vendor experience, and procurement integrity. The vote came only after council members rejected a motion to postpone for executive session review and voted to cut off further debate—moves that underscored deep division over whether the process had been fairly conducted.

Key Speeches

"Large enough to serve and small enough to care. We're a family-owned and operated business. My father started the company in 1986." — Matt Blackburn, Vice President and Owner, Universal Waste Systems

"There are a few questions that arise for us and then we ask that you mayor and council review the bid from our competitor universal waste services to confirm our findings uh in their response as we do not believe their bid was complete." — Sadiq Young, General Manager, North Phoenix Business Unit, Republic Services

"These two companies are separated by one single point. I really like you to consider what is not on that spreadsheet. Republic Services has done just as a mayor has encouraged us all. They have had a partnership with this town. They have invested in local nonprofits. They have supported community events." — Tammy Bell, 20-year resident, public comment

"Changing contractors isn't just changing trucks. It can mean confusion, transition problems, and the loss of relationships that took years to build. A new company may make promises, but a company that has already served this town has a record we can see." — Jonathan Phillippy, 13-year-old resident, public comment

Timeline

Opposition

Number of speakers against: Two substantive speakers against (Tammy Bell, Kathy Certes); two who voiced concerns mixed with praise for cost savings (Larry Meyers spoke for the change but noted past issues with single-hauler pricing; Sadiq Young did not oppose on principle but raised procedural objections).

Main concerns (from public and council):

  1. Missing documentation: UWS did not submit required financial statements (worth 10 points in evaluation), route maps and scheduled route days (required per RFP), or proof of recycling facility access (Sadiq Young and Councilwoman McMahon both noted absence).
  2. Incomplete RFP response: Republic Services challenged UWS's bid as incomplete; Director Weldy stated RFP language allowed discretion (word "shall" vs. "may") and committee deemed package sufficient, but this sparked procedural questions.
  3. Reliance on current vendor for route data: UWS stated it would use route maps provided by Republic; this violated the RFP requirement that proposer present their own plan, raising questions about cost accuracy without independent route analysis.
  4. Lack of recycling facility agreement: UWS bid listed Apache Junction facility (not state-of-the-art per Hannah Larrabee) instead of Republic's Salt River facility; UWS acknowledged inability to secure timely disposal commitment letter, yet pricing was approved without that locked in.
  5. Vendor inexperience: UWS currently serves ~5,300 homes in Arizona City (unincorporated, Pinal County); Fountain Hills has ~10,578 single-family homes—nearly double. Republic has 15-year track record in the municipality.
  6. Recycling quality: Hannah Larrabee toured Republic's new recycling facility (described as "state-of-the-art") and was concerned UWS's Apache Junction facility, though "efficient," was not as new or likely to produce usable recycled material to the same standard. This affects environmental outcome and long-term disposal costs.
  7. Process integrity concerns: Councilwoman McMahon asked why RFP completeness standards were not applied uniformly and why staff did not require submission of missing documents before scoring. Allen Skillicorn later suggested those missing items should be reviewed in executive session to determine materiality.
  8. Campaign contributions: Allen Skillicorn noted (in explaining his vote) that Republic Services made a "pretty significant donation" to someone on council (March 3, 2024), raising conflict-of-interest concerns—though town attorney clarified campaign donations are not legally defined as conflicts requiring recusal under the town's ordinance.

Most compelling arguments from opposition:

Organized groups: None formally identified, though Republic Services (as vendor) presented rebuttal; community members testified individually.

Support

Number of speakers in favor: One explicit supporter (Larry Meyers); support implied by council members voting yes.

Main arguments:

  1. Cost savings: UWS bid was $1 per month lower (88.8 vs. 87.8 score, with lower cost being a factor). Meyers emphasized four bulk pickups per year vs. one under Republic—"a major cost savings to residents."
  2. Four bulk pickups annually (vs. one): Gayle Earle confirmed UWS provides quarterly bulk pickup at no extra cost; significant convenience for property owners with yard waste.
  3. Proven operational capability: UWS operates in five states (California, Arizona, New Mexico, Kansas, Missouri), serves ~100,000 single-family and 15–20 thousand multi-family/commercial customers weekly, employs 800+, operates two landfills, and uses state-of-the-art fleet and container-tracking technology.
  4. Local representation and responsiveness: Matt Blackburn (owner) and brother Mitch Blackburn (Scottsdale-based local rep) promised personal involvement; company claims 98% of calls answered within 60 seconds, average hold time under 30 seconds.
  5. Community event support: UWS offered (voluntarily, not contractually required initially) to provide portable restrooms, handwashing stations, and trash service at all town events (Christmas parades, July 4th, etc.) at no extra fee.
  6. Competitive bidding process: Council members voting yes (particularly Rick Watts) noted the RFP was "extremely detailed" and staff did an "excellent job." Allen Skillicorn explicitly endorsed the committee process and the lower-cost choice: "There is a lowest responsible bid. There was a lowest responsible bid."
  7. Lower cost justification: Allen Skillicorn noted approving Republic would constitute a 32% cost increase; supporting UWS keeps costs flat or slightly lower for residents.
  8. No service-level reduction: Director Weldy confirmed trash and recycling pickup days, frequency, and service levels remain unchanged; bulk waste moves from annual to quarterly; electronic waste and hazardous waste events continue (with UWS adding portable facilities).

Most compelling arguments from supporters:

Project Details

Vote Breakdown

Procedural votes:

Outcome & Next Steps

Decision: Universal Waste Systems awarded the municipal solid waste services contract for the Town of Fountain Hills, effective January 2027 (upon expiration of Republic Services' current agreement in January 2026—note: transcript reference suggests the incumbent contract ends January 2026, new contract begins January 2027; exact start date not clarified in discussion).

Transition plan:

Conditions / requirements:

What comes next:

Controversies & Context

Bid completeness allegations: Republic Services publicly challenged Universal Waste Systems' RFP response, citing three missing required documents: (1) financial statements (10 points in scoring), (2) collection route maps and schedules (mandatory per RFP language: "shall include"), and (3) proof of recycling facility access (disposal site ownership or access letter). Director Weldy acknowledged that the RFP used discretionary language ("may" vs. "shall") and that the committee determined the UWS package was "complete" despite these omissions. However, he did not explain why the committee accepted an incomplete submission or how it justified scoring a bid missing 10-point financial documentation alongside a complete bid from Republic.

Process transparency / executive session debate: Brenda J. Kalivianakis requested a two-week postponement and executive session to allow council members (though not the public) to review the full RFP and underlying bid documents and determine materiality of missing items. Motion failed 2–5. Town attorney noted that under state law, RFP documents cannot be made public until after council decision, but council members may review them in executive session. Brenda J. Kalivianakis argument—that council has a duty to verify bid completeness before voting—was overridden by the majority, who voted to end debate and approve.

Recycling facility concerns: UWS cannot access Republic's Salt River recycling facility (which Hannah Larrabee toured and described as "state-of-the-art") and instead will use the Apache Junction facility ~30 miles away. Councilwoman McMahon raised liability and street wear concerns about trucks traveling 30 miles (via Highway 202 and Mesa roads) vs. a local facility. Director Weldy noted the current Republic facility "burnt down some time back" (earlier in the contract), and that UWS's facility is "efficient" but not as new. Hannah Larrabee questioned whether recycling quality would match Republic's standard.

Campaign contributions / conflict of interest: Allen Skillicorn, in explaining his vote against UWS, noted that Republic Services made "a pretty significant donation from Republic Services to someone at this DAS uh back on uh March 3rd, 2024." He implied this should have triggered recusal. Town attorney responded that campaign contributions are not defined as conflicts of interest under town ordinance and do not require recusal. No council member formally recused.

Vendor experience and risk: UWS operates in five states but serves only ~5,300 homes in Arizona City (unincorporated); Fountain Hills has ~10,578 homes—nearly double. Councilwoman McMahon expressed concern about UWS's limited municipal experience and the risk of service disruption. Director Weldy countered that UWS has a proven transition process and deep operational experience nationally. However, no council member formally vetted UWS's references or performance history in comparable Arizona municipalities.

Community relationship value: Public speakers (especially Tammy Bell and Jonathan Phillippy) emphasized that Republic Services had invested in local nonprofits, youth programs, sports sponsorships, and community events over 15 years—intangible benefits not captured in the RFP scoring. The debate reflected a philosophical split: cost-minimization vs. stakeholder relationship and community investment. Allen Skillicorn stated position that the "lowest responsible bid" should win (a procurement standard) clashed with Tammy Bell's plea that "trust can't" be replaced and that a 1-point difference in scoring should not override 15 years of partnership.

Councilwoman McMahon's fiduciary concern: McMahon asked whether cost savings were real, given that Republic provides free hazardous waste and electronic recycling annually ("couple hundred, 000 in value"), whereas UWS's contract is less clear on these services. She also noted that UWS's 5% rate-increase cap (vs. Republic's 3%) could erode savings over time. Director Weldy countered that services remain the same and staff will manage any rate escalations. However, the long-term cost comparison was not fully resolved in debate.

Republican accountability / emergency procedures: Allen Skillicorn opposed the motion to postpone, arguing that emergency council meetings exist to ratify unexpected costs and that staff should not be granted blank-check authority. This echoed his later opposition to the stormwater contracts amendment (Item E), where he took a similar fiduciary stance. The pattern suggests Allen Skillicorn voting bloc (2–5 minority on this item) prioritizes procedural rigor and cost control over operational flexibility.

Duration

Other Notable Items

Downtown Facade Improvement Grant Program (Item D): Council approved a voluntary grant program offering up to $10,000 per property (50% reimbursement) to revitalize commercial/mixed-use buildings in downtown district. $50,000 annual budget (potentially supporting 5 projects at max). Eligible improvements include painting, masonry repair, windows/doors, ADA accessibility, and energy-efficient upgrades. Ineligible: murals, landscaping, interior remodels. Approved 7–0 after debate over whether to retain Section 5.7 (sustainability language encouraging recycled/locally sourced materials and energy-efficient appliances). Allen Skillicorn motion to remove 5.7 passed 5–2; then council voted 7–0 to approve the program as amended (without 5.7). Councilwoman McMahon and Rick Watts opposed 5.7 as unnecessary (already in building code) and potentially costly; Gayle Earle and others wanted to keep it for encouragement. Program launches April 2026, applications due May, review/selection June, implementation July 2026–June 2027. Grant committee includes development services, planning, economic development, building safety, fire department.

Stormwater Maintenance Services Contract Amendment (Item E): Council approved 6–1 amendment to increase on-call stormwater cleanup contracts from $50,000 to $150,000 per vendor (five vendors = $750,000 cumulative authority, though only 2–3 typically respond). Allen Skillicorn cast sole no vote, arguing the increase constituted a "blank check" without accountability and that emergency procedures (council ratification) should suffice. Director Weldy explained that staff still must have budget approved (currently ~$150–200k available until June 30) and must obtain purchase orders before work begins; the $150k authority merely allows faster vendor response to emergencies without returning to council mid-storm. Allen Skillicorn countered that Golden Eagle Park cleanup was a capital project (not emergency repair) and should go through normal budgeting. Council majority (6–1) accepted Weldy's position that this was essential operational flexibility for 90-day winter storms. (Note: Golden Eagle Park stormwater cleanup cost ~$800k but included reconstruction, not just debris removal—a distinction that muddied debate.)

Mural Placemaking Strategy (Item C): Council directed staff to explore mural program expansions (beyond current utility-box program) and return with zoning code amendments and design standards for planning & zoning review. Councilwoman McMahon opposed, citing concern that murals dilute the distinctive utility-box aesthetic and that government regulation of artistic expression invokes First Amendment complexities (government cannot be art critic). Allen Skillicorn, Rick Watts, and others supported, citing success of Roosevelt District in Phoenix. No vote taken; item was direction only. Staff to bring zoning text amendments to PNZ Commission.

Charles McDermott appointed to Planning & Zoning Commission (Item A): Unanimously approved (7–0) for partial term February 18, 2026 through April 30, 2028.

View source transcript ▼

Source: February 17, 2026 Town Council Regular Meeting — February 18, 2026. Auto-generated YouTube transcript; may contain transcription errors.

I'd like to call this meeting to order. Would you please rise for the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America to the stands one nation indivisibley and justice for all. And the person that was going to do our invocation tonight could not make it. So, we'll take a moment of silence in memory of Jesse Jackson, Nancy Guthrie, and teacher Linda Davis from Georgia. Thank you, town clerk. Could we please take roll call? Mayor Fidell, present. Vice Mayor Skilicorn, present.

Council member Earl, present. Council member Calibianis. Council member Watts, present. Council member Laravey, present. Council member McMahon, we have a quorum. Thank you. And we'll move on to uh summary of town events. Uh town manager Rachel Goodwin. Uh thank you, mayor, council. Thanks to everyone for being here tonight. We have a packed house. Um I have a a wide variety of updates that I'm going to share. So I'm going to move kind of quickly.

Um first and foremost, I this was just brought and dropped off um here at the dis about 3 minutes ago. Uh you might have noticed when you came in, we are beginning to um promote our 250th celebration as part of the nationwide 250 250th celebration. You probably saw banners on the avenue. Um I'd like to share that our new shirts have arrived. So this those um it is a collaboration with state 48. Um so those are usually highly coveted.

Um they are limited edition and they will be going on sale to the public tomorrow. So feel free to swing by um town hall to grab yours. We will also have them available at some select events coming up this spring. Speaking of events, we hosted the concourse in the hills this past weekend. Um, and it was a tremendous success with more than 11, 1100 cars on display and thousands in attendance. Um, it's a fantastic showcase for the community and a great turnout overall.

And I would argue the weather certainly didn't hurt either. Um, a reminder that this weekend is the Chamber's Fine Art Festival that take place um, downtown. Please be aware of street closures and heavy traffic throughout the downtown area and plan accordingly. We also have the teen takeover scheduled for February 28th at the commun community community center hosted by our mayor's youth council. Details are about that are online, but it is open to all of our teens throughout the community.

We also will be hosting our third annual dementia friendly summit. Um it's fast approaching and registration has already surpassed last year's numbers uh which is a great sign. This free event is scheduled for March 7th at the community center and it's a valuable resource for anyone impacted by dementia including caregivers, family members, and friends. Uh we have attendees registered from across the valley and and you can still sign up now through the town website.

In other news, our public works is well underway. Milling operations on Palamino began this morning. Residents should expect increased heavy tr heavy truck traffic on the adjacent side streets throughout the week. Um, but it is a good sign that we are moving forward with that project.

Um, you all may also notice that we have some new raised pavement markers that were installed in the roundabout last week and additional markers are scheduled for installation along Montana um, later this week, weather permitting. I want to pause on our updates um, and I wanted to take a moment to recognize and thank our financial services technician uh, Sonia Kukula. Sonia has been with the town for 15 years and she will be retiring on Thursday.

Thursday is her last day and we wish her a wonderful retirement filled with time with her husband, her grandson, and her soon to arrive second grandson. Um, and I would be remiss if I didn't mention, I'm sure she'll be spending many hours cheering for her favorite teams, including both the Cardinals and the Phoenix Suns. So, thank you so much, Sonia, for all your time. Finally, uh, tonight is our first meeting under the newly adopted rules of procedure and call to the public format.

You may have noticed a brief informational video playing as you entered. We played it a couple of times. Um, that explains how to participate in our meetings. I'd like to pause and ask that we replay the video now for those here in attendance and those watching online. Hi, you're watching this because you want to know how to take part in public comment at our town council meetings. We're thrilled that you want your voice heard and we're happy to explain the process.

First, there are two ways you can speak at town council meetings. You can speak on items specifically listed on the agenda and at the end of the meeting during call to the public, which is the time to speak on items and issues not on the agenda. When you walk into council chambers, you're going to come here and pick up a comment card. If you wish to speak on multiple agenda items, well, you need multiple cards.

Once you completely fill out your speaker cards, you're going to hand them to the town clerk who sits right there. All speaker cards need to be submitted by the time the meeting begins. Incomplete or late cards are not accepted. If you wish to speak during call to the public, you must fill out a physical card at the meeting.

If you are speaking or wanting to comment only on a specific agenda item, you can also fill out the card online, but it needs to be submitted by noon the day before the meeting. Speakers have up to 3 minutes and are called up to speak in groups of three, alternating between four and against as indicated on the card. Call to the public is limited to 30 minutes total.

We appreciate you taking the time to make sure your voice is heard, and we look forward to seeing you at an upcoming town council meeting. Mayor, the last item I wanted to remind is that we do have a meeting next week. We have our Tuesday on the 24th. We will be um having our annual budget retreat meeting. It's so fun. If you guys would like to join us, you are welcome to. We will be here at 8:30 in the morning.

Um it is a usually a very long day, but I appreciate um the dialogue and the direction that it provides. A reminder that while it is open to the public, we do not take public comment during that meeting. With that, mayor, that's my update. Thank you. We have a lot going on in the town for sure. We'll move on now to uh proclamations, awards, and recognitions. And we're going to start with the stellar students. And the mayor tonight is going to start with the uh Little Falcons.

So, we have two recognitions for Little Falcons. The first one is for Hunter Munch from the Little Falcons preschool. Is Hunter here? So, let me read let me read you about Hunter. Hunter always walks into school with a huge smile, ready to learn and play with her friends. She is eager to explore the classroom environment and has shown so much growth in her confidence this year. Her positive nature comes through each and every day.

She demonstrates all the characteristics of a great Falcon and is such a joy to have in the classroom. Congratulations, honey. The second one is for Lucas Rabbino. And this is kind of special for me because he's my great nephew. So, here's the teacher's comments on Lucas. Lucas is a very smart boy. He loves math and numbers. He also enjoys listening to stories during circle time. Lucas has many friends and loves to play.

He is very kind-hearted and often notices the little things that others miss. Lucas is always willing to clean help clean up even when he doesn't make the mess. Lucas is a sweet boy and I love having him in my classrooms. Congratulations, Lucas. And now we'll move to the vice mayor with the uh the next student. Yes. Is Alina Jones here? Here she comes. All right. So, I'll read this off. Molina Jones is a wonderful student. She works so hard and has made great progress, especially in reading.

She's kind and a friend to all. She is always honest and someone you can rely on. We're so proud of her. Councilwoman McMahon. Thank you. Wyatt Jensen, would you please come up? Hi, Wyatt. Wyatt is such a great kid. He's been working so hard and excelling at school, especially in math. He is kind to everyone around him and has worked hard to get focused and to be a good falcon in class. We're all proud of his accomplish. Congratulations, Wyatt. Councilwoman H. Hannah Larabby.

Is Miss Rosindoka here? Rosyn. Yay. Uh Ros Lindoka is a dedicated and disciplined honor student. She is a quiet, creative, hard-working, and bright student and always a pleasure to have in class. Rosyn works hard and gets along well with everyone around her. She always has a sweet smile to share with everyone. She consistently embodies the values of the Falcon Way, being respectful, responsible, safe, and kind.

These principles are evident in her actions with peers and staff alike, making her a role model within our school community. Thank you, Rosyn. Council member Watts. I'm looking for Joshua Hill. Joshua is a talented scholar who consistently works hard in class and demonstrating an exceptional commitment to his education. He is involved in our I21 program which caters to advanced learners in social studies, ELA, and science.

He's also a talented artist who has won artistic competitions and even had his work published. Josh embodies the Falcon way every day. He's a quiet learner among his peers, showing respect, responsibility, kindness, and safety. He's well-liked and respected by both students and staff. Congratulations, Josh. Council member Khali Bianakis. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Is Taran Wolf here? Taran? Well, maybe she's not, but we still have some nice things to say about her.

Taran is a prime example of what it means to be a Falcon. She is never afraid to put herself out there and try something new. Always representing the Falcon way. She's positive. She's confident and she's so kind to everybody around her. Not only is Taran a wonderful student, but she has a very talent, she's a very talented dancer and a new member to the palm team. It's a pleasure. Her teacher says, "It's a pleasure to be able to teach Taran Wolf every day." Council member Earl, thank you.

So, Christian Daniels from the high school. So your teacher Sandre Lavine says, "I can personally attest that Christian Daniels is a true Falcon. Not only is he a responsible and respectful student, his conscientious work ethics is ethic is an understatement. His growth has been amazing both academically and as a young student. He is just a great kid. Christian is always helpful and is kind towards his peers. He is always a pleasure to see both in and out of class.

I believe Christian will always strive for excellence. Now, if we can have the council get behind us here, we can get a picture, a group picture. On three. One, two, three. Awesome. Cool. Thanks, guys. Congrats. So, next up we have our veteran of the month recognition. And tonight's honore is Chris Brandt from the British Royal Marines. Let me read a little bit about Chris Brandt.

Chris Brandt is a former British Royal Marine officer who served in Northern Ireland during the Troubles and later commanded Royal Marines aboard the HMS Manurva where he also worked long alongside US Marines and served with the future king of England. During this period he met his wife Ellen whom he shared over 50 years of marriage with.

After military service, he earned a degree from the University of New Hampshire and built a 31-year career in educational textbook sales with McMillan McGra Hill, serving as president of the Arizona Educational Representatives Association. In Fountain Hills, Chris became a dedicated member and longtime agitant of the Marine Corps League detachment, supporting veterans and community causes.

He and Ellen also led major efforts in Golden Triver in the Golden Retriever rescue organizing successful fundraisers and parade events. He was a founding for board member of the Fountain Hills toy makers helping grow the organization into a major charitable program serving schools, shelters, and hospitals. The couple also coordinated and participated in the home delivered meals uh program.

After becoming a US citizen in 1983, Chris was active in local politics and civic leadership, serving as a precinct committeeman, political club president, board member, fundraiser, and parade organizer, earning community recognition. Overall, Chris Brandt combined military leadership, professional achievement, and decades of volunteer service to veterans, education, animal rescue, and civic life, leaving a strong and lasting legacy in Fountain Hills. Chris Brandt, come on up, please.

I love this country and it's given me so much. It's given me a bride, beautiful bride of 51 years now who I met on the flight deck of HMS Manurva when we visited uh back in 1973. Uh, as I say, um, I I've met with US Marines around the world, uh, either on a commando carrier or as, um, down in Puerto Rico when I was there with, um, our ship HMS Manurva. Um, also in a in a a NATO squadron. So, there have been a number of times where we've worked with US Marines.

So when my good friend Tate Elki came to me and said, "Would you like to join the newly formed Marine Corps League, then it was an obvious choice and I was delighted and I cherish the the friendships I've made with the members there and I thank a lot of you for being here today. So, um, I am now, as I say, u, uh, a very proud American, and I'm just going to do a little, uh, a touch, if you don't mind, for a moment. Not too far. Now, no music, no. Here we go.

There's um there's there's one more piece I'd like to say. I love this town. And so 25 years ago when I was reading the Fountain Hills Times, a newbie came along and said, "We we don't have any culture here." So the following week, the following week I put something together and and sent it to there and I'll try and uh remember what I had written. Do you need the artist brush when you have the desert sunrise? Are you eager for the singer's voice? When you hear the coyote's call?

Do you yearn for French perfumes after summer squalls have passed? Nay, not me, as I stand in awe of nature's perfect jewel. But how to tell to those far off who have never adventures close the does a writer's pen succeed with a poet's verse does not. Nay take my eyes and my ears and my fountain hill soul. It's only then that you will know where cultured lives exist.

I thank you uh for being here and uh next weekend if you come to the stores, if you see uh as you will probably see uh some of our representatives from the Marine Corps League uh outside those stores, please go over to them uh and say how do you do and thank them for their service. Again, I love this town. I love this nation and I'm very proud to be an American citizen. Thank you very much. Yeah. I'll wait for it to quiet down a minute. Okay, now we'll move on to the mayor's business spotlight.

So today's mayor's business spotlight is the streets of New York. Today, we are proud to spotlight and congratulate the streets of New York. A True Valley staple since 1976, this family-owned restaurant has been serving award-winning New Yorkstyle pizza, pasta, and Italian favorites for nearly 50 years. After serving Fountain Hills for almost two decades, we are thrilled to welcome them back to our community.

Located in Plaza Fountain Side, this beautiful new space offers not only incredible food, but one of the most scenic dining experiences in the East Valley, overlooking the park and our world famous fountain. With seating for 92 guests, a full bar featuring signature cocktails, and a convenient to go area, Streets of New York is perfectly designed for family diners, date nights, and gatherings with friends.

What makes Streets of New York especially meaningful is not just the food, but their commitment to the communities they serve. Over the years, they have supported local schools, youth sports programs, nonprofit organizations, and community events through fundraisers, sponsorship sponsorships, and donations. As a family-owned business, they understand that being a part of the community means giving back to it.

From fresh dough made daily to their proprietary sauce and family recipes, Streets of New York continues to its commitment to quality, hospitality, and creating a true neighborhood gathering place. Please join me in congratulating Lori and Ryan. We are grateful for their investment in Fountain Hills and their continued dedication to our community partnership. Please come on down if you're here. Good evening. Thank you, Mayor Fidel. Town Council members, I've know some of you.

Thank you so very much. And we are so appreciative for the support of the Fountain Hills community. We've been here for 20 years and we're so pleased with our new location in front of the fountain. You've all supported us. You welcomed us with great open arms and we're so thankful. I was here in Fountain Hills, I believe in 1977 or 78 when Henry Mancini was playing music for Fourth of July in front of the fountain.

I've had a strong connection to Fountain Hills, a desire to want to be here and be with all of you. A warm, lovely community. And and honestly, this is what communities are all about is the warmth, the friendship, the support, the children coming in, watching them grow, the systems that develop, the community support. We thank you for this opportunity. I've been doing this in Phoenix for 50 years with Streets of New York, currently employing 370 employees.

I hate to think what that would be over 50 years, but anyway, it's a large number and I'm so thankful and grateful to all of you and to Mayor Fidel for this opportunity to be here this evening. Thank you so much. Okay, now we'll move on with presentations. Rachel, mayor, tonight we have an update um regarding our community center and all of the different programs and activities that are over there.

While Director Snipes pulls up his presentation, I did want to take a second and thank some of our staff that are back in the back of the room while they're here simply for moral support tonight. Um they are part a big part of the reason um our community center is such a popular amenity in our town. So with that, I will turn it over to Director Snipes. Thank you, Mayor Councel. Um as Rachel said, we're here tonight to kind of go through um many of the things that go on in the community center.

We won't touch them all. we don't have that kind of time. Um, but it's also in recognition of the support that this council and the councils before you have given to the community center and the importance of that in our day-to-day operations that occur over there and the differences that that that has made in the pole that the community center now has. um having some really nice amenities within it and being up to date with all the technological advances that have happened.

Um so just want to say a thank you to to all of you and uh the councils before that have uh helped towards this process. Um when it comes to growth and participation, um the community center has done a lot of that over the last few years. Um, we've seen the speaker presentations are now over averaging over 80 people and that wasn't that was a number that we dreamed to get to was 80 for a single and now we're seeing that constantly.

Um, and that's a a tribute to how hard the staff work to make sure that our presenters are good and they continue to be good. Um, that doesn't come easy. That means off hours going places, hearing people talk, um seeing how they present and then figuring out if it fits our niche for the people that come to our community center. And they're clearly doing that. Um as we're now drawing 100 plus participants in many of our um speaker engagements.

Um currently there's 70 plus weekly activities for active adults. that's far and away from from where we were when I started here 10 years ago. Um seems like it's been on doesn't seem like it's been 10 years, but it has. Um and so um with that um means that we're catching more and more people and finding the things that they like and bringing them into the community center um where they can truly be welcomed and uh find a place of unity within our town.

Um, this year we tried something a little different to try and draw in uh some new members and that was we threw a uh had a comedy show come in. You really got to hit the nail on the head when you're choosing a comedian to come in and talk to a bunch of people. And we ended up with over 250 people that came to attend that. And the uh the deal to come in to it was you had to be a member of the community center and then it was a free offering to them.

And so that proved to bring in a lot of people to uh become members of our community center or sign up early. Um here's some pictures of just how full the all the ballrooms were. Um lots of people and it was it was a very big success. Um the community cent's um programming has definitely continued to improve. Um we're now starting to see weight lists on our um programming that we're we're doing because the participation rate is so high.

Um our some of our biggest ones are line dancing which if you ever walk by and you look in the room is completely full end to end. Um requires multiple different instructors to to make sure that everybody can see what's going on because it is a big uh a big success. and we've added night classes as well to help try and accommodate as many people as possible. Uh, another thing that we never used to do is we have a lot of games that are now out in the lobby.

And you see that picture there to the right. Those tables are often full with people playing cards or uh different types of games on the tables that are just there in the lobby and don't take up a classroom necessarily, but provide a a space for us to program and and bring people in. community cent's operation has continued to grow.

Um, this just gives you kind of an example of how many days of each month that we were open as well as uh the number of hours that the community center was in operation. um since we went to having steady hours at the community center probably five or six years ago now, something like that. Um it is has really proven to be a successful way to operate the community center.

People didn't know when to come or when they couldn't come in the past because some days it would be open late and some days it would be closed early. So, um, by having consistent hours, it's made a big difference in the amount of people that can come and know when they come that the community center will be there for them. Um, as we talked about, the memberships continued to grow. Um, we've started doing some different ways of reaching out to people.

Um, the newsletter alone is reaching 3,500 people now. Um they've moved the flyers around in the community center so that they're easier to locate as well as we've started adding advertisements for the community center in the park uh kiosks and a lot of people are starting to um catch that and and then it draws them to the community center to become members. As you can see from 24 to 25. Um, we increased our membership and in 26 we're already at 1438 and that was as of a week or so ago.

Um, so we we are seeing a steady climb and and that number is above where we were at at this time a year ago. So we're confident that we will um once again have our membership increase at the community center. One of the interesting things and things that I may catch a little bit of flack for is that I each of the last two years I've had to ask our town staff to park in the side lot to help make room for the people that are using the community center.

I've been notified of the 122 steps that it takes to go the extra distance. Um, but our staff has been more than willing to do that and that also makes a big difference for the people that are coming to use our community center. um the attendance growth um for our for the programs that we're running. Um as you can see year-over-year um we're continuing to increase those numbers. Um and th this is just the program attendance. So at a 24% increase in revenue as well.

um those those turn into real numbers and I know that that was something that this council asked us to uh focus more on is is trying to increase our our revenues and um staff has taken that to heart and and worked very hard to make sure that we're offering programs that bring people in and increasing that revenue. Um as you can see there um the December programmed attendance and this does not include any of the rentals from 24 to 25 increased by nearly u a thousand uh participants.

Um we're finding that each one of our events is continuing to grow that we're hosting over there. Um community services wide we have one of the best problems you can have is we're a victim of our own success. We're not growing in the number of people that we have working, but the number of people that are showing up are certainly growing.

And to this staff's credit, they work really hard and continue to push and are willing to take on that extra load that that comes along with having more participants and more people there in on a day in and dayout basis. Have lots of new and expanding programs both. Um, we offer just a little bit of everything for for everyone.

We try and and and find the spots that are that are hot as well as continuing to bring in new programs to where that we can stay ahead of the curve and figure out what the next best thing is going to be. Um, Ma Jang is one of our big ones right now. um we keep having to expand from classrooms to ballrooms and that's a big jump when you start doing that and then we're filling those up as well.

So um we have a really active community that are always willing to come in and and and spend their time at the community center and uh and offering good programs that make people feel welcome is why that happens. Um, here's our year-to- date revenues that that have been climbing. Um, the community center operations itself is uh at $82,647. Um, and that's year-to- date for for um from 21126. Um, so we just wanted to do a full year run at it. And so that's what these numbers represent.

And then our senior services operations revenue is at 82569. Um and that's a 36% increase year-over-year. So um substantial increases in um in participation as well as in outside rentals that we also talked about wanting to increase. Um so we've been seeing more and seeing repeat customers. Um, that's not all the community service that the community center offers. They have a lot of other things that are some behind the scenes and uh some offsite.

Um, but we're now averaging about 18 different pieces of medical medical equipment per month that are going out to help people that may just need something after an operation or have somebody coming to visit. and our community center staff works with them to get them the right piece.

Um, sometimes people come in and they don't even know what they need or what we have and and we can combine the two of those to make sure that they're getting um the right equipment and the best equipment that they can get. Um, we also have our home delivered meals um that that are run out of the community center.

I know several of you have or are currently participating in that and um that's just a great way to to get out into the community and make sure that people have at least a good meal each day and spend some time visiting with our our residents. Um then we have the give a lift program and make a difference day as well. Um the care cards and crafts.

We were just talking this morning during our meeting about how someone that was on our home delivered meals who got a care card and craft for Valentine's Day and had reached out, called in and said how much it meant to them because they were having a bad day. And to see that someone had spent the time to make them a craft and write a nice card to them meant the world to them on that particular day.

So, um it's just one of those things that that we do on an everyday basis that to to run things, but when it hits home and and someone uh appreciates it, it's really nice to hear back. Um there's also been uh recognition for the community center being the best event venue as well as uh the best community outreach. Um there's always something going on in the community center.

So, um, when when when people come in, we want them to to to leave a little bit happier than they were when they came in and and we're finding that that that is the case. Um, want to talk about our facility use and the rentals. We're down to having only nine Saturdays left for 26 that are available. So when when you ask for us to push and and and get more more weekend rentals, we're doing that as well.

Um and again with the limited staff that we have, that that means that everything has to be coordinated correctly. Um and Jen Lines does a great job of making sure that um we have the right people there for each of the activities and each one requires somebody different or a different combination and making sure that each person uh each group that comes in gets um the same treatment um to where that events run as well as possible.

Uh we just had a uh bridge tournament over the weekend um that saw uh 250 people playing at it. Um those have been very successful. We've had several over the last few years that are three-day tournaments. Um really makes good use of the community center for weekend um setups and tearowns.

lots of other things that the facilities used for um for mayoral uh debates um breakfast with Santa, sensitive Santa, season celebration, the all of those all all of our um holiday celebrations exceeded our expectations again this year and we keep pushing the uh the boundaries of what we can handle and then talking about what we're going to do next to make next year's even better.

Um, we've gone to where that we're starting to combine our departments to to have enough staff to to run bigger events at the at the community center as well. Um, as you can see, weddings, baby showers, um, senior expo, um, all the blood drives that we do throughout the year. Uh, it just it's a place that has a little bit of everything for the community. We're really excited about uh a agreement that we've come to with ASU's uh Osher Lifelong Learning Institute.

We'll be hosting classes offered by ASU um with expert-led presentations and and learning opportunities for our community center members to attend for free. um as well as bringing in outside people that that go all throughout the valley. There there's classes offered and people travel throughout the the valley to go to those. And so we're really excited to be bringing this in as well.

And we've already gone from talking about doing one and trying it out to scheduling several just because the partnership has been working so well. We're really excited about um the classes and things that they'll be able to bring in that we would never be able to pull off by ourselves. So, it's again a a a great way to uh show the partnerships that our staff are building with outside people and and bringing those in. With that, I'll do my best to answer any questions.

I do have several staff members that are here in support and so if I don't know the answer, I may be able to lean on one of those. Council member Watts, Kevin, I know how much you enjoy these presentations in the limelight, but what I would ask you to do is have your staff stand so we can recognize them as well. You did a great job of introducing them, but they've done an outstanding job supporting us as well. So, thank you. That was a very good uh presentation, Kevin.

And the one thing that I know having heard this several times in the community is that our community center staff knows just about everybody that walks in the door. So if somebody's missing from an event or a card game or something, they're on it right away and they they check on these people. So that's that that goes above and beyond. And I don't know a lot of other communities that do that kind of thing. So again, kudos to the staff for taking an interest in our residents and our community.

So that that's well well done. Well done. Absolutely. All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate it. Have a good night. Now, we'll move on to our consent agenda. And uh can I get a motion on that? Motion to approve consent agenda. Second. We have a motion and a second. Town clerk, can I get a roll call, please? Council member Watts. I. Council member McMahon. Hi. Council member Calibianis. I. Council member Earl. I. Council member Larabe. I. Vice Mayor Skilicorn. Yes. Mayor Fidel. I.

Motion pass. Thank you. We'll move on to our first regular agenda item and that's consideration and possible action regarding the council subcommittee's uh recommendation for planning and zoning commission to appoint one individual to serve a partial term from February 18th, 2026 through April 30th, 2028. So I move to appoint Mr. Charles McDermott to serve a partial term on the planning and zoning commission from February 18th, 2026 through April 30th, 2028. I request a second for that motion.

Second. Okay, we have a u motion and a second. Uh are there any comment cards on this one? No, there is not. Okay, can we uh get a roll call vote, please? Council member Earl I. Council member Laravey. Hi. Council member McMahon. I. Council member Calibianis. Hi. Council member Watts. Hi. Vice Mayor Skilicorn. Yes. Mayor Fredell. I. Motion passes. Thank you.

And we'll move on to uh item B, consideration of possible action regarding the solid waste agreement number 2026-044 with Universal Waste Systems. Uh Rachel, uh Mayor, I'm going to turn this over to Director Wy, but uh just as a brief preview, the we issued an RFP, um this past fall for solid waste services. Um this is the conclusion of that process. Um the director will give us a little overview and I believe we have a vendor presentation as well. With that, I'll turn that to you.

Thank you, mayor and council. Solid waste agreements for small communities like this tight-knit communities can be challenging. For the last nine years, there has been one vendor, but arriving at that vendor almost 10 years ago was challenging to say the least. We've had incredible amount of success going to a single hauler. There have been challenges, but all of our contracts have term limits and the one that we are currently using has reach is reaching that limit in January of next year.

As part of the process, a very detailed request for proposals is published not only on the town's website, but several other organizations grab that publishing or that posting and and sell their wares and help. We received two, one of them from the current vendor, which is Republic Services. We are familiar with them. and the second one from a new firm that we were not familiar with. There are four of us that were selected to serve on this committee and at times it was challenging.

Um, as I look at the town manager, her patience were especially running out with me. But when you have hundreds of pages to read and you've got to go back and forth and read the math and then you have to stop and go to the counter, I don't know, 75 times or take a phone call, it takes a little while. But please note that everyone that served on that committee was vetted and they did their job and we sat and discussed some portions of it and we reached an agreement.

We brought that agreement back to procurement and we are here tonight to present that agreement to you for consideration. Now, please note that there is a representative from the proposed vendor in the audience and he has prepared a PowerPoint and would like to share that with you if you're interested. During this time frame, he and I and his name is Mr. Blackburn. We will take questions and do the best that we can to answer them.

So before I open the PowerPoint, are there any immediate questions that we might be able to answer? Mr. Blackburn, Mayor and Council, let me introduce Mr. Blackburn. He will do in the pre be doing the presentation tonight. Good evening. Good evening, Mayor, Council. My name is Matt Blackburn. I'm one of the owners and uh the vice president of universal waste systems. I u prepared just a brief presentation. It's only a couple slides and really just more of an introduction of our company to you.

Um so I'll run through that real quick if you don't mind. First of all, one of the slogans that we use in the company and throughout all of our operation is large enough to serve and small enough to care. We're a family-owned and operated business. My father started the company in 1986. And uh what's been important to us is that we maintain um all the services that the large corporate companies can have.

We have MURF experience, organics experience, landfill experience, transfer stations, all the collection trucks, we build our own trucks, we have our own um services, but we always wanted to make sure that we had that personal touch of a private company that we could offer to the cities and the um towns and communities that we service. And so that's been very important to us.

So throughout this process, if we're selected, I will always maintain and be a point of contact to you through the term of the contract. My brother Mitch Blackburn is here. He lives in Scottsdale and he's our local representative in Arizona. So he'll be part of it, but you'll always have a member of the ownership that uh will be part of the community um if we're selected to be your waist hauler. So So basically um real quick, so we believe we bring a depth of experience.

We have a proven track record. We have probably 20 cities in California, Arizona, New Mexico, Kansas, and Missouri. We see ourselves as a strategic strategic partner. We're going to be part of your community. Um we're offering a service to your community that some cities offer themselves. So, we'll be very involved with you and then at the end of the day, you always have our personal commitment that the services will be up to the standard and we'll be here to uh make sure that that happens.

As I stated uh briefly, Universal was incorporated in 1986. Uh we have over three decades in the business. WS was founded and owned and operated by the Blackburn family. I've said some of this already, but we were provide services in Southern California, Arizona, Kansas, Missouri, and New Mexico. We have 25 strategic locations across those five states. We uh employ over 800 employees, have 350 collection vehicles.

Uh we have experience in organics um which is something that'll be coming to the Arizona eventually. Um MURF recycling services trash. We operate we operate uh two landfills. Um we provide service to over 100,000 single family and between 15 and 20 commercial industrial and multif family customers throughout every week. And then we have a sister company Spartan Container that's located in Costa Grand.

They build all of our trucks and equipment and they'll be building all the equipment for this contract if we're selected. Our customer service is local. So, we'll have an office here locally that will handle all the calls. They're backed up by a customer service center in Arizona, um, New Mexico, and California, but our primary point of contact will be here. We have the ability to translate over 100 languages. So, we can offer all the services. I have a few stats.

Uh 98% of our calls are answered within the first 60 seconds. Um all the the average call length is about a minute and 50 seconds and our average hold time is less than 30 seconds. So we really pride ourselves on being available to the community and making sure that we're answering the calls uh when they come through. This is just a brief video. I know that um we're new to the area, so this is one city that we collect.

I wanted to just let you see what our trucks look like, our containers, and see us out in the field just to give you an idea of what you would see if we were selected to be It's one of our collection facilities. Uh the transition period um as was stated, you know, can be challenging. We think we have it down pretty well. We've done it several times. Um you know, we'll start with collecting data. Our field our reps will be out in the field.

They'll be doing field audits long before we ever start any of the transition. Uh we work with local vendors that will do all the container transition and in a minute I'll explain to you how we track those uh for accuracy and then all the collection vehicles will be ready in operation before uh service starts. So we've partnered with a local company that's created an app for us and this app tracks every container movement that we make.

So, every container that gets delivered and removed from every house within your within your community will be um pictured, timestamped, and dated so that we can verify service as we go through that transition process, which can be complicated. We can always go back. It's all done in real time. So, we'll be able to immediately know if the trucks have been there, if the container was exchanged, and we'll have proof of uh service as we go through. And this will last throughout the contract.

All of our bulky items, container exchanges, any misolctions, anything like that will go through the system so we're always tracking. At the end of the day, our core values are centered in faith, trust, integrity, and hard work. It's our commitment to provide exceptional service at a fair rate to the communities we service. And you have our family's guarantee on that. So, I'm here and uh welcome to answer any questions that you may have. Councilwoman, I'm sorry, Vice Mayor uh Skillard.

Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Uh I just want to thank staff for putting this together. I mean, looking through this, it all seems so professional. Seems like very thorough. Um you know, both companies gave uh you know, a bid that um you know, seem to meet the needs. There are some minor differences, but there's also intangibles. Uh, when I do a little a little bit of research myself, I go to websites of the companies. Um, I do notice Republic has a DEI program.

I do notice that they have a 100% score with HRC. Um, which really doesn't meet the values of Fountain Hills. And frankly, Fountain Hills has an ordinance against that. Uh, so I think that the choice is just crystal clear. Uh, so I'd like to make a motion to approve this as drafted uh for uh universal waste management or waste systems. Second. Councilwoman McMahon. Excuse me. Thank you very much. If you don't mind, Justin, I have a couple of questions. Okay.

I want to say thank you to the committee. I appreciate your time and diligence, but the only information I have about this process so far is what's on the agenda. So, it's public knowledge that I'm going to inquire about. Um, I understand the score was very, very close and I'd like to know if there were face-to-face interviews conducted with both candidates. Mr. Mayor, council member, no, we did not the committee did not elect to have a face-to-face meeting with any either one of the applicants.

We felt that uh what they submitted was sufficient plus all of the amount of time and research that we did. Okay. Um, I also have concerns about the fact that um, Republic is a lot more experienced in in representing municipalities and in um, uh, waste disposal and pickup and the um, this town this company is not is new to Arizona. Um, they currently pick up trash in a very small unincorporated unincorporated town in Arizona City in Pino County consisting of 5,300 homes.

I'm sure we have a lot more homes than that. And it concerns me their experience compared to our long-term 15-year relationship and experience with a quality company like um, Republic. So, I have concerns about that and I'm just letting you know. Um, in addition, um, I noticed that in the agenda it talked about that the applicants had to provide collection route schedules and maps. They're required in order to have the application considered.

And it states that the proposer shall include a proposed route schedule and maps detailing the collection areas, route sequence, corresponding days of the week. It's mandatory. I didn't see it. Um one minute let me finish so then you can address it. Okay. Um in essence this is their book of business. And so you know usually when a person is um applying for a job or whatever they do their due diligence and they apply especially a service company is going to um provide this information.

So why wasn't an actual do you know why an actual map was not provided even though it stated it's required? Mr. Mayor, council member. So there are several things in the submittal process and the request for them where the word shall appears. If you read a little bit further down into the next paragraph, we use the word may. And that allows for not only the town but the committee members to determine whether or not the submitt package is complete.

In regards to this one, we felt that the package was complete. Please note that as part of this agreement, we will work through the current vendor and if they are selected, the new vendor to develop these routes and make sure that all of the route information is accurate. Um, I have a question about that too because again, why are they relying on their competitor to provide this information? Are they have they already agreed in writing to give this information or not?

Council member, they're not relying on the competitor. They're relying on town staff and not provided that. Is it town staff's job to provide that information? Yes. And yes, ma'am, it is. Okay. Thank you for asking that. Um I time I think we're we're allowed a couple minutes. I'm asking questions due to the presentation, please. Thank you. And I have I have a couple of them. Um, is their trash pickup going to be like on the same day?

Um, are they going to provide hazardous waste and electronic waste pickup annually and provide for that because that's a couple hundred,000 in value that Republic already provides. And um you know the I'm I'm not sure about the contract savings because you know I know that the contract says it's 5 years and and in what is it three years they can raise it up to 5% where I understand Republic raises you know has a cap of 3%.

So in the long run if if some of the similar and same services um aren't provided it's really it's really may cost the town more. So, I have concerns about the reality of the cost and the true savings that each consumer is is going to receive. And um there's another area too that it states in there that um they don't have a contract with the re with Republic's recycling facility. That if they don't get that written agreement, then do they have that written agreement?

So, council member, there there's a whole lot of questions there. We're going to kind of unpack them in categories. So, let's go all the way back. So, the service level or the level of service and the dates of service will not be impacted by this new agreement. It'll be the same date. The the difference will be in regards to the bulk waste will be quarterly and it will be on the same day that the regular is picked up.

In regards to the household hazardous waste and electronic recycling event, there is a minor change to that and that change is the vendor has offered to provide to us the restroom facility and the handwashing facilities for those events. We'll discuss some other ones later on as part of the agreement. In regards to the current contract and the rate increase, there is a section in that paragraph that states they are required to submit that in advance to the town and not like any other contract.

If there's a substantial change that exceeds the procurement or the town manager authority, staff will be right back in front of this elected body or the elected body at that time to discuss that. Okay. Um, what about their trucks? Are they lighter than the current ones? Um, are, you know, is it going to be more damage to the streets or not? And in addition, I'd like to go back and revisit the re the green recycling center. Point of order. What's your point of order?

Mayor, our new policies say that you have two minutes and then other people would be permitted to speak. I I don't believe a timer was even set. Would you finish this one question and then we'll move on to the next council person? One question about the they don't have a contract with Republic for the recyclables and they'd be driving out to Apache Junction and my concern with that is is that's 30ome miles away from here.

the wear and tear on the um beine highway, the wear and tear on streets to Mesa, the wear on and tear on uh highway 202. I mean, do is that is a considerable consideration to make. Are there intergovernmental agreements about that? You know, do you need to involve MAG or anything like that? Because that's going to create damage to streets that we have no business creating damage to. And I have a really big concern about that as far as liability for the town. council member.

So, the the logistics and the transportation related to that, all of their trucks are state-of-the-art. They are providing trucks from a neighboring state that has far more compliance mandates than this little community in regards to the use of the state and local highways. There's not going to be a substantial increase for the recycling. most of the same transportation or logistics are going to be going to nearly the same areas.

In regards to bearing the responsibility to haul that recycled material to a different location, that's not our responsibility to manage. It's theirs. Our responsibility is to ensure that they comply with the agreement. I understand that. But we don't drive, we have it right here down the street. We don't drive that far with our trucks. Well, not getting into the weeds a whole lot further.

You'll recall that that facility burnt down some time back and the town's recyclables were taken to another location. So, I'm not going to get into their business and what they may or may not be able to accomplish in the future, but they have currently met the requirements for us to bring it forward tonight. Thank you for answering my concerns. I sincerely appreciate it and thank you for letting me ask them. Councilman Watts, Justin, I'm going to try to be succinct as I can.

I ask for your succinctness as well. Uh, one of the things that jumped out at me was in the certificate of insurance. It says a city of Fountain Hills. We were a town and sometimes the additional insured can be problematic. So, I asked that we make sure we get that changed. Have we ever had any rejected loads for recycled materials? Mr. Mayor, council member, are you referencing the current agreement with with Republic as it stands today?

Have we ever had any rejected loads for hazardous materials? I'm not aware of any. And had there been any, it would have been to them from them to their own facility? Thank you. The liquidated damages we are they stipulated in the contract? Yes, sir. And a payment bond. I saw a performance bond. Well, I don't see any payment bond. Is there a payment bond required? Yes.

And all of that will be part and it's a it's a relatively large sum of money that will be part of the agreement and handled through the procurement officer. Right. They got an 88.8. What was the missing 11.2? I can only comment on the stuff that I reviewed and not the others because I don't see what their responses. There was simply some things that they didn't measure all the way up to 10. Maybe they got a seven and a half in my opinion.

Nothing jumps out at you as to anything that's problematic. No. Anything that I had any concerns about, I did my research on and spoke to others in the building regarding that concern. Thank you. I think that overall I thought that the staff did an excellent job. I thought the RFP was extremely detailed. The responses were extremely good. Is there anything in United's or Universal's proposal that is currently that they have excluded that Republic has included? No sir.

So it's whether it's grants, whether it's the number of bulk train, anything that that Republic does today, we've got it included in our in the universal proposal. Just to be clear, one has nothing to do with the other. The solid waste agreement has nothing to do with the grants. I understand that. But Republic has been beneficial to the town by providing grants and funding and and ancillary type of support to the town. Do we have that same expectation for Universal?

Not standing before you tonight, sir. I'm not going to put them on the spot and ask them for something. It would be inappropriate for me to ask that as a contract administrator. You want me to ask them? You're more than welcome to ask any questions you'd like, sir, of them. Thank you. You're welcome. On behalf of the staff that did the work, they're behind me. Thank you for your kind words. Thanks. They did. They did do an excellent job. Uh Councilwoman Earl. Okay. Thank you, Mayor.

I I want to appreciate all the work that you did for both with both companies uh working on these um RFPs and looking into the next possible uh trash hauler that we have. I would like to confirm um one of the things I had res a couple residents ask me about. Does the new contract allow seasonal residents to put their service on hold uh when they're not here? Mayor, council member, the answer to that is yes. Great. Okay.

And then I wanted to just confirm we're going from one bulk pickup a year to four bulk pickups a year without an extra cost to the residents. Is that correct? That is also correct, council member. And then I heard possibly there would be free portable restrooms at town events. Am I hearing that right? That's a possibility. Council member, we currently have an agreement for two recycling events. Staff will work with the vendor on the balance of the events. Okay.

And oh, did you want to answer that? Okay. Um, sorry about that. Yes, that is something that we do in every city. So, every event, your Christmas parades, uh, Christmas parties, Fourth of July events, whatever events happen throughout the community, we'll provide all of the, uh, portable toilets, handwashing stations, and the trash as part of our service. It's something we do companywide for every community that we service without an extra fee. No extra fee.

No, it would be included and we're willing to add that as an amendment to the contract. It should have been in there from the beginning. It's something we always do. Okay. Thank you, Councilwoman Larby. Oh, I'm sorry, Brenda. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. Um yeah, I'll make it really brief and I would like to reserve time after the comment cards to make another statement, but um when I'm looking at this the average score 87.8 to 88.8. This was a close call, no doubt. Is that correct? Uh Mr.

Mayor, Council Member, that is correct. Yeah. And so I I think I think that's important to bring out. Um, regarding the recycling facilities, which I think is an important component, I know Republic and the waste hauling is pretty close costwise. The recycling element Republic is slightly more.

Now, you and I and part of this this council went to Republic and we looked at the new recycling facilities that are state-of-the-art and um it it was a great tour and I know they spent a lot of money um trying to get clean recycling that is actually usable as compared to a lot of the country when there's a lot of recycling but there's there's so much foreign matter in there it's it's basically it's garbage and and it gets hauled off to China.

um th this facility um that I guess they're not going to be using that's going to be in Apache Junction. Are you familiar with with that recycling facility? Yes, council member. I'm familiar with the landfill and the recycling facility and and again is that a state-of-the-art upto-date facility because they are there there's a substantial savings going to that one as compared to Republic. Could could you just give us your observations? I would use a the term it's an efficient one.

It's certainly not as new as the near or the closer one. It is it is an efficient facility that operates at the capacity designed. And again, when when they the recycling process is as pure and usable as the one that they use for Republic because we specifically talked about that when we did the tour that when when when you have the recycling facility, it's the the bundles that come out, are they usable for recycling or not?

and and we we've had a conversation on that and and I'm I'm just wondering is the the one in Apache Junction going to be as high quality as the one that we're currently using. I'm not able to answer that question because I've not reviewed their finished product bells bells that they prepare. Okay. Thank you. You're welcome. Councilwoman Larby, Justin, I want to first of all thank you and your staff for all of your hard work on this. Um, I know that we had our executive session not that long ago.

Um, well actually fairly long ago um, regarding the RFPs on these. So, thank you for putting these together. Um, my question was I think you had mentioned how many um, proposals did we see receive that were complete? Mayor Council member, we received two proposals. We received two and this was the more affordable option, the the cheaper option. Council member, it was not only the more affordable, but it checked several other boxes for the different reviewers. There were four of us. Thank you.

And um out of the four reviews, um if you're willing to share, was it unanimous? Was it kind of tight? What what was kind of the feeling of that room for the committee? Um, I would be the outlier on that. Um, my score didn't align with some of their scores. It's a little bit different. I I've been doing this for quite a little while here for solid waste. Outside of that, yes, we're you could refer to it as unanimous in regards to the winning score. Okay, thank you. No further questions.

You're welcome. And thank you for the kind words. Again, the people that do all the hard work are back here. I believe They were they were when this meeting started. They're they're ducking right now. I think we'll move on and see if there's any comment cards from the public on this. Yes, mayor. Um the town received two written comments with a position of four and we received five cards from individuals requesting to speak.

So with that being said, I will start with Larry Meyers followed by Sadique Young and then Tammy Bell. Mayor, council. Uh so 44 year resident and I was here when we had lots of trash haulers and they did just fine. Then we got a single hauler. My bill went up. My service went down. That would be Republic. Did I put up with them? Yeah, I put up with them.

But when a contract comes up and you look at it and from what I can read and also having the benefit of having a uh pretty highly acknowledged family member in the waste management business by its very name. I had my own research team do the research on this company. They compete vigorously in Southern California where this much stricter than here. Uh you can't breathe over there. Am I right? Um so I don't have any doubt that they'll do just fine collecting our trash from Fountain Hills.

We have 10,578 single family homes I think at my last count in Fountain Hills. So okay. So, they serve a city that's half as big. Um, I look forward to you guys approving this contract because four bulk pickups a year as opposed to one on the property sizes that are here in Fountain Hills is a major cost savings to residents. Big. I use it a lot. And I pay a lot of hauling costs down to the dump because we only have one pickup. So, wherever I can save some money, I like to save it.

I'm sure that's the way the Fountain Hills residents see it as well. Um, I I think these guys will do just fine. A trash truck's a trash truck in my view, and I don't really give a crap whether they uh beat up the 202 or not because if you ever go on that road, there's lots of trucks on it. So, um, and by the way, my wife happens to be employed by the Puma Reservations, so that landfill is part of her overall employer.

And I think um, I hope you guys approve this contract because I see cost savings in it. I see conveniences in it that I don't see from Republic. I never have seen from Republic and I never really wanted Republic. So, um I was h like I said I was happy with my um previous hauler when we had lots of haulers and I don't think we'll see any additional damage to the streets because a route is a route is a route. Thank you. Please approve this contract. Hello.

Good evening, Mayor Fidell, members of council. Uh, my name is Sadiq Young. Um, I'm here on behalf of the men and women at Republic Services. I'm the general manager of the North Phoenix Business Unit. Um, and these are the men and women who diligently serve your community, uh, picking up curbside waste and recycling over the last few years.

Now, I'm not here to talk about our yearslong service and our impeccable record of care, uh, and dedication to your constituents, but I'm here to talk about and discuss, uh, your plans for the future. Uh, we want to remain in Fountain Hills. U,, our drivers want to continue serving the community here in Fountain Hills. And I heard a few comments uh, here uh, during uh, the previous statements and I wrote some notes here and I want to just kind of address a few items.

Um, our bid for service we believe was fair and complete. Um, we responded to all of the requests in the bid for service and based on the notes and some of the comments I hear today from the staff report, it appears the recommendation was made based on price. Uh, we understand that our rate was higher uh than our competitor. We also under understand what it takes to run the routes effectively in this town and so we pride ourselves on our ability to keep your streets safe.

uh as our huge trucks uh into your neighborhoods and we're remaining consistent and having reliable equip equipment here and a staff that cares about your community. So, while price is important uh but cheaper is not always better. As we reviewed the staff report, I heard a few comments here as well. So, I just want to touch on a few things.

Um there are a few questions that arise for us and then we ask that you mayor and council review the bid from our competitor uh universal waste services to confirm our findings uh in their response as we do not believe their bid was complete. Uh number one the RFP required a financial statement to be included uh in the bid which was worth 10 points to the final score. During our review of the published staff report we could not find any financial statement uh from UWS.

It's possible we missed it or that it was redacted. Uh however, based on what was published, it does not appear to have been included by UWS in the original bid. Number two, the RFP required the proposed uh excuse me, route maps and scheduled route days, which was also discussed here today uh included in the bid. Uh we couldn't find any indication that UWS provided this detail.

Instead, they stated in their bid that they plan to utilize collection routes provided by us, the current service provider. Uh but that was not the requirement of the bid. The requirement was to present a plan. Pricing is based on the number of drivers and trucks you'll need and the hours per route. Without a route plan, you cannot estimate costs accurately. Number three, the RFP required proof of disposal site ownership or a letter certifying you have access to a disposal site.

We own and operate the Salt Salt River recycling facility as was mentioned up here. And at the time of the bid submission, we had not provided a letter of confirmation to UWS. However, in their bid, they stated UWS plans to utilize the Republic Services recycling facility for the co-mingled recycling. Just to move forward, we are unable to secure a timely disposal commitment letter from Republic. So again, to price the service, you must know the cost to process recycling.

How can pricing be accurate without this information? If I can two more seconds, please. Time's up. Is my time up. Sorry. Good afternoon, mayor, vice mayor, council members, and staff. My name is Tammy Bell. I'm a 20-year resident of Fountain Hills, and I am here to speak as a resident, not on behalf of anyone else.

You are faced with the decision tonight with a very narrow scorecard, one point, and I know that the committee worked very hard, and I respect the amount of work and time that they put into that. In addition to the committee scoring, I am here to respectfully ask you to also consider the values in the history of our town. I'd like to share a quote with you.

Whether you you volunteer with organizations across the town, support our local businesses, or attend our events, including the monthly coffee with the mayor. You are helping make this such a special place, a positive place where we all come together to help each other. Do you remember who said that? It was mayor at the state of the town last month. And I wanted to bring that up because mayor, you said it beautifully. You stated the true spirit of Fountain Hills.

We are a town with deep rooted connections and a culture that celebrates who who lives here, works here, and serves here well. We demonstrate, you demonstrated that tonight with stellar students, with honoring our veteran, honoring our local business. The Hall of Fame celebrates individual service. The Chamber Gayla celebrates contributions that enhance our quality of life. and the Fountain Hills Community Foundation.

We know they work so hard to raise money and give it right back into our nonprofits. No one could argue that Fountain Hills is a special town with small town character that values service, partnership, and those who invest in our community's well-being. So, with that, I return back to the agenda item. These two companies are separated by one single point. I really like you to consider what is not on that spreadsheet. Republic Services has done just as a mayor has encouraged us all.

They have had a partnership with this town. They have invested in local nonprofits. They have supported community events. They have shown up consistently. They are not just a vendor or a signature in a contract. They are known and trusted partner who has intentionally become a part of the fabric of our community.

I respectfully ask you to consider not only the committee's recommendation but place real weight on relationship, trust, history, and demonstrated generosity because those very things are what makes Fountain Hills a very special place to live. Now, please don't just take my word for it. If any of you know me, you know I like data.

So I did some research and I did find that the longest running study um the Harvard study of adult development does show that HQRS that's highly that's a high quality relationship are one of the strongest predictors of individual health, community well-being and long-term economic and social stability. That said, communities thrive when relationships are strong. And I'm just here today to say I hope you take that perspective into mind when you make your decision. Thank you for your service.

Next we have Jonathan Felipe followed by Kathy um Cerites. Good evening, mayor and council members. My name is Jonathan David Phillippy and I've spoken here before. I'm 13 years old and I want to start with one simple idea. The decision you'll make tonight can shape the kind of town my generation grows up with and the kind of town our seniors can continue to live in comfortably. I understand the council is considering replacing Republic Services with a new refuge contractor.

I know budgets and contracts matter, but I respectfully ask you to consider something just as important, community impact and long-term relationships. Republic Services hasn't only collected trash in Fountain Hills. They have supported organizations that help young people, including programs that provide safe places, mentorship, and prevention efforts to keep teens healthy and on the right path. Those programs make a real difference to families and kids like me.

At the same time, Fountain Hills is a town with many senior residents. Reliable, consistent services are not just convenient. They help seniors remain independent and comfortable in their homes. Consistency matters here more than in most places because stability is one of the reasons people choose to live in this community. Changing contractors isn't just changing trucks. It can mean confusion, transition problems, and the loss of relationships that took years to build.

A new company may make promises, but a company that has already served this town has a record we can see. I am not saying that universal waste systems is bad, but I feel Republic Services is the better option. So before making this decision, I respectfully ask you to think about what Fountain Hills values most. Stability, relationships, and people who invest in this community over time. I may only be 13, but I know this.

A town that takes care of its seniors and invests in its kids is a town that's thinking ahead. And before you vote, please remember trash contracts can be replaced, but trust can't. Thank you for your time. Mayor Fidel, council members, that was a tough act to follow. Ditto what Jonathan said. This is an important decision. Buyer beware. We are dealing with an organization that has been serving our community for many years. We know who they are. They know who we are.

They operate safely in our community. They operate with steady hand. And I think it's important for us to make sure that we know exactly what we're buying here. A lot of companies will come in low bid to try and get that business and you don't know where it's going to go. We know what we have right now with Republic Services and as a 19year resident of Fountain Hills.

I am against the consideration of the solid waste agreement with universal waste systems and I am for maintaining our relationship with Republic Services. Thank you. Is there any other uh council discussion? Councilwoman Larby, I just had a quick um I think it's a point of clarification. I might be using the wrong term. Um but will members of the council that had received campaign contributions from the applicant from the other applicant recuse themselves from this vote?

Mayor, are we aware there's any recusals? As far as I know, there there are no recusals. Um, but under the the um conflict of interest, whether or not you've received a campaign donation from a vendor is not a conflict of interest. So, even if they did receive a campaign contribution, it's not something that they have to disclose. Well, if I may provide a a personal opinion on that, I think that would be the um honorable thing to do. Council member Khali Bianakis. Thank you, Mr. Mayor.

Um, yeah, in full disclosure, before this meeting even took place, I had conversations with the town manager and um I I I requested that this vote be postponed for two weeks and that we go into an executive session so we can study this further. Um, you know, I'm not new to this game. I've done other requests for proposals. We get resumeumés, we get cover letters, we get in a lot of information on the request for proposal, who's applying, and then we can look at them.

I understand that state law says that the requests for the requests for proposals can't be made public until after the bids have been accepted and this council has said what it's going to say, yes or no. But that doesn't preclude the council, just the public from looking at these requests. I think Sadiq has brought up very good points about this process and for us to just overlook the the process. Did did they have all the required information that would be required on an RFP?

I want to know before I vote if everything was provided equally and fairly. I know that there were some immaterial things that were missing. I want to be the one that determines what is immaterial because I think that's point of order. That's what the the people point of order. Your point of order. Um I'd like to ask is this discussion appropriate right now? May I ask the attorney is this discussion appropriate right now? What her what she's saying?

If there are questions regarding the legality of the procurement, we should take that into executive session. And so to continue that that is what I asked. I I think that's what we should do. I think two weeks isn't going to kill anything. Are you asking to move into executive session right now? No, I I would like I would like to put this off for two weeks and then go into executive session when we have the time to to review the RFP more completely. That's that's what that's what I was asking.

Then you make a motion to postpone. Okay. Make a motion to postpone for two weeks so we can get go into executive session between now and then. Second. We already have a motion and a second on the floor. The motion actually this would be a a motion to technically it's not postponed but miss but that t this the motion to postpone takes precedence. So we go ahead and vote on that and then um if it fails then we continue on. point of something. Sorry. Clarification maybe again. Mayor, is that okay?

Motion to motion to table would be the actual That's what I think. Yeah. Can't we just make a motion to recess into executive session? Well, right now the motion to um uh table has been put on the unless it wants to be rescended has been made. So that that one takes precedent over the uh motion to go. we need to do the motion to uh table.

Although if they if there was then a motion to go into executive session, we could do a new motion to table after the executive session if that was the decision. I um I guess I'd be asking if mayor if the council member would be willing, we we could just recess now for executive session if there's concerns rather than postpone.

No, I appreciate that inquiry, but I I think the information that would be needed would require way more time than we have tonight and it would go well past past midnight. Mayor, may I ask the council member what information would take two weeks to to get? I think what Sadique said um publicly would would be the things would would be looking for and it would be for this council to review the RFP. I know the p the public can't review it, but this the council we can't do that either.

That's not that's not following proper procedure. So, you have a motion to table. Did you get a second? Yes. Who was the second? All right. So, we need to vote on that. Yes, ma'am. Uh roll call vote, please. Council member Calabianas, I. Council member Watts, nay. Council member Earl, nay. Council member McMahon. Thank you. Council member Laravey. Nay. Vice Mayor Skilicorn. Nay. Mayor Fidell. Nay. Motion fails. If if I may proceed then um with my motion. Point of order.

Isn't there a time limit that I recall? I I that was one one issue. Then I did want to make motion to call the previous question. Second. We have a motion to call a question and a second. Can we get a roll call, please? So, would would this suspend all further discussion? So, point of order. We're going to vote on something that's going to affect every without being recognized. Point of order. Can I be recognized? So, what are we voting on? Please.

If you don't know, if you don't mind, if you don't know, oh, seriously, stop it. He's He wants He's calling I would like to know what we're voting on, please. He's calling the question to end debate. Correct. So, the motion on the table is to call the question, which would end debate. It's been motioned and seconded. Roll call, please. Council member Watts. I love being first. I Council Member Earl I, Council Member Laravey, I. Council member Calibian, nay. Council member McMahon, nay.

Vice Mayor Skilicorn. Yes. Mayor Fidell, I. Motion passes five to two. Go back to the original motion and second that was that was issued some time ago. Can we get a roll call, please? And just to clear what the motion is, it's to uh accept this uh contract as presented. Yes, Mayor. Council Member McMahon. No. Council member Laravey. I. Council member Earl. I. Council member Calibianis. Nay. Council member Watts. I. Vice Mayor Skilicorn. Permission to explain a vote. Go ahead.

So, as council members, we do have a fiduciary responsibility to the residents of the town. Yes. We did. The chair gave permission. This is not debate. He asked for permission to explain his he asked for permission to explain his vote. That's enough, please. Yeah. So, the the council has a fiduciary responsibility to the people of the town. Typically, in the bidding process, you go with the lowest responsible bid. There was a lowest responsible bid. Are you lecturing us or explaining?

Point of order. And I'd just like to point out that going with Republic Services is a 32% increase over the bid that appears to be passing. Uh so I just want to remind people that 32% increase versus actually a small decrease for the people of Fountain Hills. And I do notice that people of Fountain Hills should look up u there was a pretty significant donation from Republic Services to someone at this DAS uh back on uh March 3rd, 2024. My vote is yes. Sorry, Mayor Fidel.

I The motion passes 5 to two. Thank you. Moving on to item 9 C, discussion and possible direction relating to creating a placemaking strategy for murals on the exterior of buildings. Uh Rachel. All right, we're moving into a very different type of discussion now. Um this is a followup to direction that was given by the council regarding um murals uh in on exterior buildings particularly um in our downtown spaces.

We've had a number of inquiries from um different business owners um and I know that Director Wesley and Director Jacobs have been working collaboratively to bring forward um some recommended changes. With that, I'll turn it over to you, John. Thank you, Mayor. Council members, I have a fairly brief presentation and and uh Director Jacobs is available too to answer questions if you may have them to part of this discussion.

But you hopefully recall back in December, uh, Director Jacobs made a presentation to the council with regard to some issues that we've been seeing in town with desires for, uh, murals to be placed on buildings. As part of the town's placemaking strategy, we've been doing murals on some of the uh, utility boxes around town, and that's created some interest uh, in seeing further expansion of that type of attraction to the town.

Uh, some of which can be done privately, some uh, by the town and some as a joint venture. So to uh determine the best way forward uh to address these the council directed staff to explore various options and report back. And so as we have done so uh we see two basic avenues that we need to approach.

First is the uh town participation uh with uh the mural process for those who are looking either at town uh uh participation in a joint venture or wanting to encourage the town uh to provide murals uh on various buildings. We have a current uh policy for the utility boxes. So we see the opportunity to take that particular program and expand it a little bit.

uh still using the various requirements and procedures that we have to ensure the quality of uh those uh murals as they are done uh on properties but then expanding that a little bit to talk about how that applies to private businesses, private buildings, if town's going to be involved, how that funding would work and and mechanisms for payments and those types of things. So that part of it uh fairly straightforward we believe just in expanding that that current policy.

But the other part of it is with regard to our uh zoning ordinance requirements right now, as you may recall a few months ago, you looked at some updates and modifications to chapter 19 of the town zoning ordinance having to do uh with design guidelines. We've also fairly recently looked at our standards for site plan review in order to accommodate murals and how that uh works with other parts of our existing zoning ordinance.

Basically, some other options for how buildings might be painted and designed. We see a need to go into the zoning ordinance and make a few changes there to define murals, to adjust our site plan uh amendment procedures and also set some standards in chapter 19 for murals. Those standards we see would be very similar to the standards we already have in the policy adopted by the town for what again uh has been happening on the on the utility boxes.

those particular changes would need to go to um planning and zoning uh commission first for their review and preparation on to the town council. So, right now, we're simply wanted to update you this evening and make sure you're okay with the direction uh that we've determined we need to go and the steps we need to take uh to uh do that text amendment through the PNZ commission before coming back to the town council with uh your action on adopting such program.

So, that's my simple presentation this evening. Any questions? Any further direction or comments you have for us? Councilwoman Earl. Thank you, Mayor. My recommendation is to take it to planning and zoning. Thank you, Councilwoman McMahon. Thank you, John. I appreciate it.

Um, I'm concerned, like I stated last time, about allowing murals because I think that, um, we have a unique visual identity and the decorated utility boxes are distinctive and thoughtfully designed to showcase what is important to our culture and what Fountain Hills is known for, like the night sky, the fountain, and other beautiful defining features. Um these small murals are strategically placed and provide cohesive tasteful sense of place that reflects what are makes our community special.

Um I am concerned about murals being on buildings throughout the town which could delete dilute excuse me the uniqueness of these utility boxes. Uh in in addition as I stated before um murals are unique form of artistic expression and protected under copyright and free speech first amendment constitution rights. So courts have consistently um held that government entities cannot act as art critics and any regulation of artistic expression must be contentneutral.

So, I'm very concerned that staff's putting would be putting itself in a position to be art critics and that, you know, that would be really a hard thing to do as far as saying yay or nay to murals, etc. So, I think that it's more it's a lot more complex and I again I think our town is unique right now. I like the utility boxes as they're painted. They stand out and I don't I'm not no offense to anybody. I'm not for adding additional murals in town. Thank you, Councilman Watts. Thank you, Mayor.

Um, at a high level, I am for this. I think as long as the standards are there, they're applied uniformly that I think it it can be a good opportunity to enhance the town. I also think that when we look at something like the Roosevelt District in downtown Phoenix, they've made that quite a destination place by doing exactly what we're talking about doing here. A lot of photography groups go there.

A lot of tourists go there to see what goes on in the Roosevelt District, which at one point in time, 25, 30 years ago, was pretty decrepit. And now it's a real hot spot. So, it brings a lot of people. It brings uh again Roosevelt District has a a plethora now of restaurants, night activities, exactly what we're looking for in as somebody refers to euphemistically as the fun district. And I think it could bring a lot of value to the town.

So my concern is writing the standards and how we apply the standards. So I'm anxious to see that, but I am a supporter and I I would agree with that as well. I think it does enhance what we've got going on here in the town, especially with the utility boxes and like Councilman Watts said, it could be uh very attractive for parts of the town. Um can we see Oh, Vice Mayor, Mr.

Mayor, I I just want to say that I'm pro mural and uh I think it's fine if staff directs planning zoning to come up with a you know appropriate system. Yeah, we're not we're not done with this yet anyway. So there'll be some some changes. Do we have any uh comment cards on this? No, we do not, mayor. Okay. So, do we need a motion and a vote, please? Uh just direction. Okay. So, I think you've got the direction. Yes. Okay. Good.

Moving on to 9D, uh, consideration possible action relating to initiate the Fountain Hills down downtown facade improvement project. Rachel. Yes. So, continuing on the discussion of the downtown improvements. Um, this is another initiative that was brought forward um last budget cycle um through our economic development.

So again, in partnership with um our planning and zoning um and our development services, they have worked collaboratively to introduce what that downtown facade improvement program um would look like and what it would consist of and begin launching that. Um with that, I believe we have Farah Hod here tonight to start to talk us through that. And then I believe Director Jacobs is also available for any questions. Thank you.

Uh, mayor, council members, as uh Rachel said, uh what I'm presenting before you is uh our proposal for a downtown facade improvement program. We're looking for your approval to initiate this program. Um, and really the goal is to revitalize our down our downtown center and uh enhance our economic vitality. Um, so what getting down to the purpose of this program? So, so many buildings uh particularly their exteriors um have aging facads and inconsistent uh uh aesthetics uh that limit the appeal.

And uh this program will help catalyze visible highquality enhancements and target financial support and create welcoming a welcoming vibrant uh corridor and also to enhance Fountain Hills uh unique desert character. There's the uh distillation of the purpose that I just uh mentioned in that first bullet point, but this is an uh an overview of how the program will work.

So, as many of you know, we currently have $50,000 in our downtown fund uh for this year and uh I believe for next fiscal year as well. And I am talking about fiscal year, not calendar year. So, what this program uh is looking to do is to utilize uh these $50,000 to for a facade improvement program. Um the way the program is formulated, as you see in the staff report before you, is we would be awarding up to $10,000 per property. And again, this is a strictly a voluntary program.

So once it is launched and uh advertised through our uh uh well what we're hoping to do is have a dedicated website and look at other ways uh to spread the word. But um it will offer up to $10,000 per property.

uh and more specifically it's it's a matching uh grant program and we would be reimbursing 50% of reimbursement costs u which would be eligible and I'll talk about eligibility uh as we as we move forward but $10,000 it could be uh a project may cost $2,000 we we just don't know yet uh it depends on the extent of the enhancements. It also includes some uh safeguards such as a maintenance covenant for five years.

And what that means is once the uh a successful applicant is uh reimbursed for the program um the maintenance cover covenant uh uh requires that they fully maintain the facade for up to five years. Uh there there would also be a clawback provision that says if it's not properly maintained then we will have some ways to either uh partially or fully um get those costs uh back to our uh account. Um the program uh if approved will uh be reviewed internally.

Um there will be a grant uh administering review program as well as an implementation program which I'll discuss a little bit later. Um we will also select the successful uh applicants as well as uh go through the design review uh approval process which is part of the implementation program eligibility. Well, this is the geographic scope of the program.

I should mention though that uh the program will apply to commercial or mixeduse uh types of developments, existing developments, not not vacant land, not not not brand new uh brand new projects. So, uh going further along, uh property owners or long-term tenants in good standing will be eligible for the program. What do we mean by good standing? current on taxes, uh, no violations, uh, no lawsuits against the town.

Uh, properties, as I mentioned, that would be eligible or commercial mixeduse projects in the downtown district within that uh, within the parameters of that map that I showed you. Uh, projects potentially would include visible exterior improvements. And I I want to emphasize that the this is a, as the name implies, a facade improvement program. that applies to building exteriors.

Um, and so what would be ineligible would be interior remodels, new construction, murals, examples of which John discussed, as well as as well as temporary elements such as potted plants or um things that aren't intended to be permanent fixtures. So when staff reviews the applications uh for both the the grant administration and the uh implementation, we'll be looking for compliance with chapter 19 of the architectural review standards.

uh an amendment to which came before you late last year where we uh changed the title from architectural review guidelines to architectural review standards where we removed any subjective standards and replaced them with objective standards so the applicants will know what will be required uh during the the review process.

Uh we're looking for examples or proposal which proposals which complement adjacent buildings um using approved materials uh such as masonry, stucco and uh accents using metal and wood uh just to name a few. We'll be looking for a desert inspired pallet which is consistent with the design standards in chapter 19. uh lighting, not not street lighting, not light post, but particularly um things such as wall sconces, um pathway lighting, things like that.

And also eligible would be ADA uh ADA compliance uh improvements as well as uh energy uh efficiency such as uh windows that need to be replaced with more energy efficient models. Um perhaps in a little bit more detail, I'll explain uh what other modifications are covered. I mentioned painting and masonry repair, windows and doors, awnings and canopies, uh shade structures uh that that may be deteriorating and may need to be uh replaced.

Um uh as well as ADA accessibility improvements such as ramps, uh maybe truncated domes if they're not within the rightway. And what what is not covered as I mentioned interior uh remodels or roof replacements uh constructions uh building construction and additions uh murals landscaping not intended to be permanent architectural design or engineering fees associated with the project.

I should should also mention any permitting fees that the uh the town would require uh would not uh be covered as well. Tools and equipment for the project as well as commercial advertising uh signage. So the review process will be two-tiered beginning with the grant application and review process. So once the program is launched uh and uh advertised uh staff will be around to for uh as needed consultations with those who are interested in participating in the program.

Uh we'll be open to counter inquiries or appointments in advance uh prior to submittal of their grant uh application. Uh then that would hopefully be followed by a formal submission and a completeness check.

Uh and then uh once we get uh a good pool of applications, the committee consisting of development services staff, particularly planning, economic development, and other staff members on an as needed basis, such as uh building safety, um the fire department uh will be reviewing these applications, taking a look at uh what's being proposed as far as their visual impact to the downtown area, economic benefit, identity, and feasibility.

And uh the successful uh applicants will be selected and they will receive a notice to proceed to the next process which is the implementation. The implementation process is really uh synonymous with the design review that is currently uh explained in the zoning ordinance. Um which uh we will be perhaps asking for more detail with regards to specification of colors uh lighting specifications that will be used.

This will be primarily reviewed by planning staff and other departments will be consulted as needed. Um, once the applicant receives design review approval, if need be, they can go ahead and apply for building permits. Not everything's going to require building permits, such as uh repainting of of of the exterior.

things that may require building permits is replacement of a shade structure, um ADA ramps, uh uh replacement of lighting fixtures so we can make sure that they're compliant with the dark our dark sky ordinance. And once the uh once the project is uh implemented, the improvements are made uh and passes final inspection, uh the town would be ready to reimburse 50% of those those costs. So what are the next steps?

Well, obviously we're here before you uh seeking your app approval to launch the program. Uh we uh once we get approval, we hope to uh get things in motion uh the coming month and launch the program in uh in April. Still not quite very date specific yet, but sometime within the April time frame. Launch the program and publish a dedicated website. Um applications would be due sometime in May. Uh the review and selection process for the grant program.

uh we're looking uh at June 2026 to go through that review process and uh the applicants would be ready for project implementation uh for the next uh fiscal year July March 2026. However, uh the funds that are currently in the uh in the fiscal year uh current fiscal year would be utilized. Um so with that I will conclude. Well actually I wanted to just show a couple examples.

Uh some of these uh enhancements uh from other uh jurisdictions that we've uh we've uh studied uh like this one here in Queen Creek can be very modest. Uh this is simply uh in well it's in the Queen Creek Town Center simple commercial building um where uh a new coat of paint was applied or uh if you want to look at some more uh comprehensive and and and uh more uh I guess uh thorough uh facade improvement programs. You can look at downtown Mesa.

downtown Mesa much larger in scale and and in fact they had about uh um they were offering $250,000 uh for each property. Um so it would uh this program would kind of pale in comparison to the scale that downtown Mesa um implemented but still worthwhile to see what the potential is here at uh here in downtown uh Fountain Hills. With that, I'll conclude my presentation and open it up to any questions uh and facilitate discussion. Thanks, Vice Mayor. Thank you, Mr. Mayor.

So, I'm willing to go ahead and approve something like this, but I want to make sure that the goal is about bringing in more business, the goal is about economic development. So, I'm not so concerned about the subjective things. I'm more interested in the quantitative things like bringing in more sales tax revenue. I want this to generate more money, okay, for the town, for the people of the town. So, that's how I'm going to lend my support. I also want the record to reflect that.

And specifically, I want to make sure that these are approved in a sense that what will improve the economic development to our downtown. That's my number one and frankly my only priority of spending this money because there has to be return on this investment. to that uh to that specifics. You know, I see some of the regulations here like I see like uh like lighting requirements frankly like the lighting requirements for me uh are just complying with dark sky. Okay.

Uh I'm not concerned of what kind of light bulbs I mean states in there. Um frankly I'll make a motion to approve this but I want to in 55 lighting take out the line that requires LED light bulbs. LEDs are great. I love them. I own a lot of them, but that doesn't need to be required for this. And then also on that note, uh in my motion, I'd also like to remove uh section 5.7. I'm willing to second that. Councilwoman Earl. Thank you, Mayor.

Now that you said that, I'd like Could someone tell us what that 5.7 was before I ask my question so we all know what we're removing? I I have it in front of me. It's 5.7 is sustainability and energy efficiency. It states that the town encourages materials with recycled or locally sourced content, high efficiency doors and windows, energy star rated rain capturing planters at storefront bases, and solar shading devices, perforated metal screens and louvers. Okay. Thank you.

So my question is there's been a lot of discussion with regards to other things now that have to do with the gift clause. So, can I ask the attorney how does how is it that we're able to give money to these businesses? Thank you. Uh certainly. So, under the gift clause, you wouldn't be able to just pick give without some benefit to the town. Um and so, you're allowed to have grant programs such as these. This one has a 50% match, so it requires u them to contribute as well.

So, therefore, um the whole cost of the project isn't being um on to the town. Second of all, it's a competitive bid proc or you know a grant process where you know the town can evaluate the the whether or not this process is going to improve to the uh council members uh Skilicorn or vice mayor Skilicorn's point uh the bottom line that it's going to improve you know meet the eligibility criteria meet the u purposes of the project.

Um, so the town, it's not that the the gift clause prohibits any investment of the town into um, you know, private benefits, but there has to be a public purpose. And there's a specific public purpose for aesthetics um, for a town. Thank you for clarifying, Councilwoman McMahon. Okay, Councilman Watts. Thank you. This is probably an unfair question, but things like this have been done in the past, not from a grant perspective, but the the lifting of facades, the renovations, and so on.

Do you have an average value of what the cost to do a storefront facade modification, remodel is? I'm trying to figure out how many the $50,000, how many remodels are going to get us. Mayor, council member, I don't have an immediate answer to that question, but like I was saying in my presentation, uh if it's if we're talking just uh a fresh uh coat of paint, it's probably wide ranging. So, probably wasn't a fair question. So, um secondly, there's a date under 4.3 that says March 31st, 2026.

I don't think we can have completion of project done by that date. It might be a little aggressive and it may just be the implementation of the program is what it meant as opposed to the actual project. Yes. So noted. Thank you for that. Uh and then finally when somebody submits their application are they submitting along with the application a schedule of values for the various components? So they can go in and say this could be part of the grant and you can delete that from the amount.

So they can get the net of what what would be applicable, but they won't get the things that are specifically excluded. Uh yeah, Mr. Chairman, I excuse me. Got to remember where I am. Mayor, council member, um that's something that we have not explored. Uh but that's uh certainly would make a lot of sense uh to review each individual improvement uh that they're proposing and perhaps amend it.

uh well amended or make a statement in there that says that the things that are specifically excluded in the outline that you just gave us are not going to be reimburseable at the 50% rate but the net amount less those would be reimburseable.

So we they'd get most of what they wanted and if they wanted to put in something that wasn't like the pots for instance were part of the plants and so on they might might not be appropriate to have them included but in the overall permitting process you would have a grand total only a certain portion will be applicable to the grant component right okay and last the energy con thing I think is already addressed in other building codes so I don't know that it needs to be in here because there's a lot of other efficiencies season.

It's a little bit it said May and it doesn't say absolute but I think all of those components energy star and energy efficient doors and all that are elsewhere in the building codes today. So just a comment 2024 international building code. Councilwoman McMahon. Thank you. So 5.7 it merely encourages it. It's not mandated or anything.

So there really isn't any harm keeping it in or correct and are all these not to question council member Watts but are all these um environmental friendly energy efficient things in the code so that um it's it's go it's um has standards etc. Yeah, mayor council member I don't know for sure if these uh uh elements that I included in in 5.7 are in the code. Um there might be uh references to Energy Star, things like that, but uh not being the building safety official, I don't know for sure.

Thank you. So since it just encourages um I would like to keep it in. It's just merely an encouragement and I I think that um it would provide ideas for applicants, you know, and additional tools and ideas in order to um have these materials and help um our town become more environmental friendly. So, I would like you to please reconsider your motion um to exclude 5.7. Please, maybe we could ask John if he has any thoughts on whether that's included in our code and elsewhere.

I seem to remember seeing some of it somewhere, but Yeah. Uh, mayor, I'm afraid I don't have too much more than what Farad has. It's in the building codes are, as Council Member Watt said, some fairly extensive requirements in there. How much they overlap, I couldn't say with any certainty. Thank you, Council Member Colleen. Thank you, Mr. Mayor. And, um, yeah, the 5.7 kind of concur.

It's what what I like about 5.7 is it directs us to use recycled which the town's been doing a leadership role on in our parks, our benches, um all over town. You can see that. And so it's just kind of following the leader the town's example. And what I love about it is locally sourced content. And I think we should always be encouraging people to use locally sourced everything including lunches for retreats.

Um, but the thing that may be a little bit in the weeds, and this might be another Rachel question, is this does seem to be a little labor intensive on staffing because, um, there's a review process. There's going to be boards, committees, um, checks, checks on checks, uh, approvals, um, then when when they start the build out, there's going to be inspections, not just for the first year, but for five years through the clawback provision. And do we have the staff to be monitoring?

You know, the first year $50,000, maybe 10,000 each. Second year it's going to be 10. Third year it's going to be 15. Are we going to actually have to hire a staffer to to monitor this? Because again, our we're we're underst staffed in this town already. We're stretched pretty thin. That's that's what you've told me. Yes. And so do do we have the bandwidth to to take on a program like this? Well, I think and you're not wrong. This it is cumbersome.

Um and it does have a a series of checks and balances built in um for a number of reasons. Not one of which being you know some of their um financial responsibilities that if we are going to implement this type of a program where public dollars are being invested we have a responsibility to make sure that they're invested properly and in in accordance to our intentions.

That being said this was staff built and staff driven um between um I know for HUD and John and Amanda worked collaboratively to come up with this. So they are standing behind it and endorsing that this they believe that this is the best process to move forward with a program like this understanding of course that it is an initial program. We're going to learn as we go if there is a better more efficient way to streamline. We will certainly look into that.

But this implements all of the best practices that we've been able to borrow from other communities um that have successfully launched programs like this. And and as you mentioned, it is a relatively small amount. So that will impact they will have relatively few projects from the get-go to make sure that we can manage it. Yeah. And and if the staff's comfortable comfortable, I'm comfortable. And this would I guess would be just kind of like a one-year trial.

And then if if there were unforeseen consequences, we can look at it next year. This is a one-year only, right? As of right now, this is funded in this budget year. That's why they'd like to get started. Um I believe the expectation is to hopefully fund next year to again launch, see how it goes. But yes, it can continue to tweak and evolve as we learn through the process. Right. Thank you. And I would say that this shows the support we have for the business community as well.

So I think it's I think it's a good idea to to do this. And I know Amanda and I had talked about this probably a couple of years ago. Councilwoman McMahon. Thank you very much. Is it appropriate to make a motion to amend um the motion on the floor and to approve um the initiation of down the facade program with um including 5.7. Do I have a second to approve? I have a motion to amend to a a motion to approve the agenda item as written that includes 5.7. Right. V. There's a motion on the floor.

Vice Mayor, would you consider amending your original motion since it doesn't direct it says encourages? So adding that in just makes the facade program cost more money and thus have to use more taxpayer funds on it. I mean, I would be a no on the whole thing if it included the sustainability because it just makes those projects more expensive and that just wastes taxpayer money.

So, if we remove the word sustainability and put um energy wise or something like that, energy efficient, just have energy, would you be okay with that? What's wrong with business owners choosing it for themselves instead of government mandating what we do? So, I don't I don't Well, I don't think it's a mandate and there is a cap on it. So, we wouldn't be spending a lot of money on, but even even if it costs $1,000 more, I mean, Energy Star windows are going to be a lot more money.

Uh, that's 50% that's being paid for by the taxpayers. Um, it my motion stands. If someone will second it, please second. Alan, did you have a second on your original motion? Oh, yeah, we did. So, we had an original motion and a second. Oh, are there any speaker cards on this one? No, there is not. Nice try. So, so we need to vote on the original motion. Um, can we get a roll call? Um, sorry. Oh, do we do the amended motion first? Oh, all right. My mistake. So, we're voting on the one I made.

Thank you. Council member Watts. I'm lucky. Thanks. Russian roulette. I want to read 5.7 again. I don't see anything in there that mandates anything. I think if we provide a schedule of values that that would help offset some of those costs and based upon director's comment that actually goes back to the last town council meeting where he did say that we didn't have the energy codes included because they were referred to elsewhere in our existing building codes.

I don't think it's necessary to have it in there. So, I would be I'm I'm torn both ways. It doesn't It doesn't matter whether it's there or not. It's somewhat irrelevant. So, I'm a no. Council member Earl, I'll explain my vote. I don't want the government telling them what kind of light bulbs and stuff you have to put in. So, I'm a no. Council member Laravey. No. Council member Calivian, just to clarify my vote, the amendment was to stri to strike 5.7. Just to leave it in. Okay. That'd be an I.

Council member McMahon. I. Vice Mayor Skilicorn. No. Mayor Fidell. I'm torn on this too, but I'm a no. Motion denied. 5 to two. Now we go back to the original motion, vice mayor's motion, and it was seconded by uh Anna Larby. Council member Calavianis. I, Council Member Watts. So, this motion is to take out 5.7. Oh my god. Um, I thought it was the other motion was to take out. It was mine. Oh, right. Thank you. I got to vote. Yes. I'm stuck. Yes. Council member Earl. I. Council member McMahon.

because I like the program a lot. I'm going to vote I. So, thank you, Council Member Laravey. I, Vice Mayor Skilicorn, yes, Mayor Fredell. And I like the program. It shows good support for our local business community. I motion approved seven to zero. Thank you. All right, we move on to E, which is consideration and possible action relating to amendment number one to contracts 2024-049 through 2024053 on call stormwater maintenance services. Uh Rachel, Mayor, thank you.

This one is a uh um an essential service for us after we have storms. As we know, when we have large um storms roll through, they it leaves quite a bit of debris and cleanup that our public works crew really takes the lead on. But uh they really do need support in making sure that we have the right resources to address it. So with that, I'll turn it over to you, Director Weldy. Thank you kindly.

I know oftentimes as I stand here, I begin to sound like a broken record when I describe the challenges we face to clean up after storm events, and they don't have to be the severe ones that make all the local and national news. Even the smaller ones require an incredible amount. I would like to note that after the last storm event, the street department along with engineering, we were out day and night cleaning that stuff up. We solicited each of the members or contractors here.

Two of them were able to respond and provide support. Let me clarify that limited. They could come out a week or so later or they could help the next day just to get the the primary roads or the local roads open and then they had to go back and come back. we quickly reached the contract threshold limit and we could have simply just done a renewal and changed the dates and stuff. That's not working efficiently in my opinion.

We had numerous internal conversations about who could show up and when and it's a challenge that we face with not only this service but other services as well. We decided to ask the council to consider an amendment to increase each one of these to up to $150,000 each per term knowing that we've had some relatively dry weather and some minor rain or you know small rainfall. But the potential exists for us to have a relatively star large event and we're going to need some help at that time.

Not unlike in the past, if there is a really big event, we are going to get onto an emergency council with all the information we need and we're going to discuss that particular event and the challenges that we face that would exceed any of these contract thresholds. With that, we certainly appreciate your support. We do have some cleanup that we still need to accomplish. We simply need the contract authority to do that and attempt to prepare for the next event.

I'll answer the questions to the best of my ability if you have any. Vice Mayor. Thank you, Mr. Mayor and Director. Ha. Have we ever had an emergency event where we exceeded uh one vendor's $50,000 limit? Mr. Mayor, uh Vice Mayor, yes, we've exceeded that by a couple hundred,000 and came back to the council for ratification. And Mr. Mayor, director, there was one vendor that was fill us in a little more of those details.

In this particular group right here, there are only two vendors in here that have responded to our large events in the past. And the smaller contracts that we had with them at this time, not this one, was again for a smaller threshold, $75,000 or so, we had to exceed that amount to accomplish our goals of getting the roads open. And so two of them in here have exceeded their contract in the past by over $200,000.

And we've had to come back to the council under emergency procedures for ratification on those agreements. Not very often, but it has happened in the past. And Mr. Mayor, there are, you know, emergency meetings that happen and things get approved. Um, are there other towns and cities that have tripled this authority? Vice Mayor, the majority of them have their own staff.

There are a few exceptions along the Colorado River in the southwest part of the state, but most of the other communities have their own staffing and equipment. The street department is five strong. So, we simply do not have the staff. We have some equipment and we can get a lot of it done, but we cannot respond to the larger ones. And as a reminder, when we are cleaning up after storms, we are not accomplishing anything else. So, we need support. So, Mr.

Mayor, it just um going from a4 million dollars spread out between five vendors to 34 of a million dollars sounds like a lot of money to me. Uh it also seems like a lot of money with with that without the authority of council. Um there are already in state law emergency provisions where we can have a meeting and you know approve something we need to increase. Um, frankly, if we are going through such an emergency, I think it's our due diligence to do that.

And frankly, we have a responsibility to our citizens to act fast and approve something on emergency situations. So, I don't look at that as a disadvantage. And and Mr. Mayor, I I think it's okay to have some flexibility, but I just think that going to three quarters of a million dollars um with no, you know, with no accountability effectively, uh I I just don't see that as being practical and that was not what I was elected to do.

Um so I would make that that total I don't mean to interrupt you is is $150,000 times five though, it's a quart million dollars or three4 million. You've only had a couple people respond, right? Only two of them responded to the last event. Mayor and Mr. Mayor, as this is written though, it would allow, you know, a Saturday evening, couple phone calls, threequarters of a million dollars spent. That's a lot of money. And the way this is written, I I could never support this. Not one bit.

So, I'll make a motion uh to approve it up to $75,000. and with a sunset of one year and then after one year if it works out we renew it or if you want to change it that's fine. Uh but that's the motion I'll make. We'll move on to the next person. Uh Rachel, did you have something you want to say? Mayor, I just wanted to offer a little more clarification because I can certainly see where your uh concerns are raised.

Understanding that this is functioning simply as a job order contract much like our other vendors in that each vendor is authorized 150,000 in none of the scenarios that Justin just shared did we have five vendors here and expending all of their authority.

Essentially, we need to be able to call someone and get them here to address issues, whether that's blocked roadways, down trees, boulders in the, you know, middle of parks, whatever that might be, so that we can get back up and open and operational. So, you go down the list and find whoever's available. Correct. And so, I I I recognize that the cumulative total is concerning. The idea is that each one has the authority so that we can call them and get them here uh on that when needed. Mr.

Mayor, that that that thank you for that that clarification, but that's not what's written here. This written here is gives staff the authority to spend three4ers of a million dollars. That is extreme and that is ridiculous. And I would have to oppose that and I have to strongly oppose that. Councilwoman Earl. Thank you, Mayor. I kind of agree with Allan, but I want more explanation on that. So, it sounds like um Director Goodwin did explain that a little more.

I was concerned too because we were going from 250k to 750k. But it when if you run out of the 150, if you had one p one company, then do you go to another company with another 150 um until you go down the line, but yet you said last time only two people was it whatever uh two companies, excuse me, um answered the call and then did they stop at the 50,000 expense? I mean, what do you do? What do you do when you don't get a hold of them?

Or mayor, council member, there so there's a few questions in there. One, yes, there are five listed here. Only two responded and were able to help. When we reached the close to the $50,000 or just under, we simply stopped. So, the work hasn't been done. Okay. So with the way it's written, if you you would call one company and once they meet reach the 150,000, you try to get another company. Once they reach 150,000, you try to get another company. Is that how this would work?

No, council member, it's not. Okay. When we have an event, we do an we reach out to all of them and we give them a list of everything that we need and there are unit prices attached to this and we ask them based on what we're sending you, we need you today, tonight, and tomorrow to get this stuff done. Give me a rough estimate on that so I can get a not to exceed. So I have to have in my hands or electronically a purchase order to proceed on any of this.

So I get a purchase order for the ones that have agreed to respond based on that scope I provided them while sitting on Sunridge and then we proceed from there.

If we reach that dollar threshold or as we are reaching that dollar threshold, I'm going to be right here in front of this council, if we're not getting any other responses and simply explain it truthfully, there are still areas in Ashbrook Wash or along Golden Eagle Park that we have not been able to address and we are reaching the dollar threshold for the one or two that show up. Please know in the past none have come out to some of the events.

So how did you come up with the maximum of 150,000 going from 50,000 to 150 then 750 with five of them? How did you choose that number? Have we ever had $750,000 in expense? Um uh council member, we had just under $800,000 to clean Golden Eagle Park just to get it functional and an extensive amount considerably beyond that downstream that's still not completed. And how did you get that cleaned up? Are you talking about the repair that we approved all that rem rebuilding there? No, ma'am.

This is after a storm. It was standing. How did that get paid for? It got paid for. We came to we got started cleaning it up as staff and with contracts we had came back to the mayor and council proverbial dump truck in hand and asked for money to proceed. In fact, it was myself and the previous community services director that stood right here in front of this elected body and and begged for money for lack of a better description.

You're asking to not to not have to come back in in front of us and ask for permission to spend more money. Is that correct? No, ma'am. I am not. Okay. Is that what Okay. Not you. We reach 150 prior to reaching that dollar threshold. I We are already going to be doing our homework to see if anybody else can get involved. But you're going to be getting emails from the town manager saying we had an event last Thursday. This is where we stand. Public works, community services, fire department.

I could go down the list. They're out there working on it. So, you're going to be aware. This isn't going to sneak up on you when you return from shopping and say, "Wait, how did we get here?" This when there's a storm event, you'll be aware of it. When we're reaching critical threshold dollar numbers, you'll be aware of it because we'll be either up here with an explanation or asking for more or some consideration.

And please note, we don't have anywhere near the budget to service more than one and a half of these agreements this year. So once we reached over a little bit, well actually it's a little bit less than that. I don't have the total in front of me, but the the environmental fund which went away and now is in public works, it doesn't have that much money. This is just gives us the ability to address for one year these events and it gives us five options to do so.

Justin, is it safe to say that $50,000 doesn't get much done? Am I right when I say that? You're correct, mayor. In fact, we we're not done. We simply stopped working in Ashbrook Wash adjacent to Golden Eagle Park upstream and downstream. We cleaned as much as we could by ourselves and we continued to return back there, but we have other things that we need to do. I want this council to know I've been in that wash with the with the public works director. It's still a mess.

We need to get this this cleaned up. But you're saying we don't have the money right now. saying that we have a little bit of budget, council member, but we don't I don't have the total amount. We have um probably 150 or 200,000 to last until June 30th. So, if we approve this, we're putting more money into it somewhere else or we're still at max to 200,000.

We're not asking for a budget increase or any transfers, simply the authority to address some of the stuff and be prepared to address the next one should it happen. So Justin, I'm going to take that and I appreciate that because that's the difference here is that this is not we're not asking for money. We're asking for the budget authority to say to say we can go to any one of these five vendors and say we have an issue. We need it cleaned up. Can you get here?

And if they say, "Yep, we're there." Great. I have $150,000 dedicated and available to get that vendor here. If they say, "Sorry, I can't make it. Already tied up in Scottsdale." Great. We go to the next one. Can you get here? can you help us with this and get this done? And so by approving each one, it's authorizing us to you pick whichever vendor is available to do the work with that that threshold number. So it's not that we're going to say, "Hey, you five, all of you come here.

I don't have enough money. I don't have I don't have $750,000 to pay them all. I have the budget available, but I need to be able to pick whichever vendor is available to get here because in the and Justin used Golden Eagle as our example. Um, but and typically hopefully we never ever ever see that scale again. However, when you have a storm, um, we're going to let you know what's going on and what type of cleanup is happening and where we're at.

If we're if we're approaching that threshold and we need to get back in here for to give you an update or ask for more, we can certainly do that. But it's not a situation of where we're calling all five and all five are going at the cleanup process all at once. So again, the authority to go to each of these vendors and authorizing this is not the same as having the money available for each one. So, and I think that that can sometimes get lost in that conversation.

Are you okay with that, Councilwoman Earl? Yes. Thank you. Good. Uh, Vice Mayor, thank you, Mr. Mayor. So, when I hear about Golden Eagle, I kind of think that's what this is about. So, Golden Eagle was not merely a emergency cleanup. Golden Eagle was a complete like reconstruction. Uh, it included a a bridge. It included a road. included a lot of other things that are were were capital expenditures, not emergency repairs.

Um, if this is for emergency repairs, I'm thinking like you have a gigantic tree blocks the road and people can't get to their homes and we need a way to clean that up. Okay. When I think of emergency repairs, I think of uh you have a a major monsoon event. You have five tons of gravel that are blocking one of the roads next to a wash. that's an emergency event. Um, I'm also thinking a bridge gets washed out.

Okay, those are all types of things where it's appropriate to have an emergency meeting and also have some funds to fix those things. But some of those if we have a a tree blocking a road, you know, I have a chainsaw, I've got a truck, I've got a tow strap, I'm willing to help. I don't think we really need to be uh uh having this unlimited authority for threequarters of a million dollars with with no accountability. And frankly, I don't think that that's this was about.

I think this is about projects like Golden Eagle, which are capital projects. Uh the the wash that the mayor mentioned, that's a capital project. That's not an emergency project. Emergency project means that there are critical infrastructure needs that need to be addressed on a weekend immediately. something like that. You know, there's a a a big monsoon event and a um there's such a erosion that, you know, water supply is wiped out. That's an emergency event.

I don't think cleaning out a wash is an emergency event. That's a capital improvement and that should go through the normal budgetary process. Uh I don't see another compelling reason why they continue this go on.

Frankly, I I'd like to make a motion to deny because I I just think this if this is approved, it is a blank check to up $150,000 these five vendors and it's wholly inappropriate and it's literally the three and a half years I've spent here, this is if this is approved, it's the most foolish thing we've done. If I may, Mr. Vice Mayor, the two things you described are totally different.

The flooding that occurred at Golden Eagle Park, that was the emergency cleanup along with all of the areas in town. What you're describing is the latter part, the capital was a whole separate project to address that flooding. So, two different things on that one. Councilman Watts. Justin, I think some of this is in the optics. And are all five contractors capable of doing the exact same thing? No. So, they have different fores. Correct. So, you have go-to contractors.

That's probably why two of the contractors exceeded that $200,000 threshold or whatever that threshold was that you talked about. That that one was Yes, that was part of a big project. That was when the majority of the town flooded. Okay. That was when I provided that example. But in fact, these two contractors have equipment staffing, dump trucks, those sort of things. Some of the other ones don't necessarily have that same specialized equipment to remove that much material from the roadway.

Right. Carol is a heavy earth movering company and a couple of the other ones I know they're smaller companies and so on. So my and my concern is that it says per contract. Are you treating this as a work order that's based on time of material or schedule of values or are you treating it as a contract? Because it the details in that contract makes it make me concerned. So th the these are job order contracts with set unit prices and clear scopes. Okay?

So you could have multiple contracts that could blow through even the $150,000 if we're not careful. So what I'm getting at is that isn't it more prudent to say the two contractors that have the most capability, the most reliable, maybe we exceed their limit, but the other ones we don't raise them quite as high. We don't have that same exposure. We've done this in the past, council member. simply were not able to respond in a timely manner. So our priorities and and let me be clear on this.

When there is a storm event, our priorities are arterials, collectors, and locals. That's where we start. So we break it up into groups day and or night. We divide the town. We determine where the most amount of rain fell and we send a person out there in a truck with a flashlight or a spotlight. They survey a section and they write down everything they saw. While they're doing that, someone else goes to another section. So on and so forth and the town is divided up.

Once we have our priorities, then we start sending equipment. As we send equipment, we begin determining we got one backhoe, we've got one Ganon, we have one small dump truck and no place to dump locally. So, we have to put it in temporary stock piles. While that is underway, we make a determination how much material needs to be moved and when, where can we put it, and we start reaching out. Do you have availability when the sun rises to send a dump truck in a larger loader?

Do you have availability to bring out your street sweeper in this case to clean it up after we get the bulk? So, in the past when we've and this is a good example, these were at 50,000. I went as far as I could reasonably go and get close to this threshold and we stopped. So, there are box culverts in Ashbrook Wash that were filled with trees and other materials that are still in that condition.

And what happens is when we begin to reach the capacities, the water begins to back up on the opposite side because we're going to get more organics and more sediment and with a big enough event boulders and stuff flowing. I understand. I've been through Ashbrook wash and a couple of the other washes and a couple of them are in bad shape and they do block and restrict the culverts. Ashbrook wash is an example. What I'm referencing are the box culverts. You may refer to them as bridges.

So this is what crosses under our roads. My concern again is with the hundred,000 $150,000 per contract. I can have multiple contracts with the same contractor and exceed your $150,000 in the same year. The unlikeliness of that occurring having two catastrophic events may be pretty rare. But the term contract gives you multiples of whatever the maximum is. That's what it looks like to me. Am I D manager?

Ultimately, what you just described is us having multiple contracts with one vendor that are $150,000 each. Is that what you just asked? I think the events, the catastrophic events that occurred, you one contractor could be selected and have multiple contracts for multiple events. And arguably that can't happen because that's against our procurement policies. But for a term of service per vendor, i.e. they get $150,000 for the vendor in its entirety for the budget year. But it says per contract.

Each one of these con each one of these vendors represents a contract. So it's five contracts in total. And if it's a matter of semantics or wanting to clarify that, we can certainly do that. increasing the not to exceed contract amount by $100,000 per contract for the term of the service a contract with each of the vendors that are listed.

So I can't go out and go and have I'm going to pick a vendor off of here Verie Valley Landscaping and say I need 150 for this project and 150 for this project and and they all go to Verie Valley. A Paul wouldn't let me do that. Um B that goes against our procurement. This is per vendor as listed. There's a total of five, but we know that some of them don't have the capability to do these larger contracts. Okay. So, meeting page 242.

If you go on the bottom paragraph here, it states this amendment would increase each of the contract amounts by 100,000 raising not to exceed total from 50,150 per term of service. So they it says contract plus per per term of service in that same sentence. Okay. But the motion as suggested doesn't say that same thing. It it says you see exactly the same thing. I'm reading it. Isn't that Isn't that saying per contract per term of service which is one year? That's how I read that.

If if I may what what's written in the staff summary is not what's necessarily I mean it is what's written in the contract but what you're bound to is what's in the contract. So if we go to further down, we can read the the amendments and and know that these are amendments to existing contracts. So the backbones of what you were looking for like the price per units are in those and that's um not included in this packet.

Um so there is having reviewed all these there's there's an actual contract that exists that describes how much we're willing to spend for whatever these services are these storm ser you storm services. Um, and so what this gives is $150,000 total for that vendor in that term. And these terms expire, I think at the end of uh I that's also in the underlying contract that's not here, but these are on a fiscal year basis. So this just goes to the end of this fiscal year.

And then usually these can be renewed um annually for up to a certain number of con uh years. So usually it's three to five. Correct. I see Paul up here. Maybe you can uh help us. Yeah, I was kind of saying it back waiting to be called, but um I'll try to add to this a little bit. So, mayor and council, what we're talking about tonight from what I understand is contracts. So, the contract authority, we still need budget.

So, Justin himself, his department, he needs budget that you've already approved to be able to spend that money using those contracts. So, he has um he uses uh the general fund. It's like $2.4 million including all the things that they do for public works in the general fund. Part of that I don't have the amount on hand is for things like this torm cleanup and maintenance and things like that.

So even though you're if you do approve these contracts with these larger amounts, he'd still need to find budget. And without that budget for these types of things, we'd have to come back to you still to get that secondary approval to spend more than 150,000 or more than that uh to do things like this that he's explaining. I think that helps clarify a little bit. Thank you. Hopefully that was helpful. Councilwoman McMahon. Thank you.

So, basically this, you know, I think we might be reading too much into it. No offense to anybody, but basically this is uh for on call storm water maintenance like in emergency situations. It gives you the tools to do your job and to re and to act fast in an emergency situation with any one or of these vendors. That is correct. Okay. I make a motion to approve as stated in the suggested motion. I'll second that. We have a motion and a second. Um, Councilwoman Earl, your lights on. Okay.

Council member Khali Bianakis, your lights on. Thank you, sir. And just just to kind of reaffirm what Peggy said, um you know, when I first saw this on the the agenda, I almost thought this could be put on the consent agenda because again, we're not they're not asking for money. They're asking for authorization to deal with emergency situations, which is just good management.

And you know, to have to call a special session to try to get the roads opened up and to handle emergencies just doesn't seem very practical. And so, you know, this this to me is a very easy decision.

And the reason that we know that it will be enforced properly is because our town manager and our staff given the emergency situation will use their best judgment to get to get it cleaned up as quickly as possible to avoid our residents um having, you know, this catastrophic damage not being attended to. So, like I said, to me it would be consent agenda, but uh yeah, I would third. All right, we have a motion and a second. Can we get a roll call, please?

Council member Earl, permission to add a little explanation. Go ahead. Thank you. Just with the clarification, my vote is yes. Thank you. Council member Laravey, I. Council member McMahon, I. Council member Calavianis, I. Council member Watts, I. Vice Mayor Skilicorn, no. Mayor Fidell, I motion passes six to one. Thank you. And Justin, you're up for the next one as well, right? Um consideration possible action relating to job order contracts for electrical services. Thank you, Mr. Mayor.

Mayor, council, this is very similar. However, we have less electrical emergencies than we do flood. This is basically these agreements allow us to address our day-to-day operations that are above the level that our staff would normally do that and it also allows us to work with the vendors on smaller projects that we have planned. They provide their expert service.

A couple of good examples recently are some some work in the community center where we used electrical contractors to help with the lighting in the fans andor the sconces andor working in any one of the parks and occasionally on some of our street lights in the downtown area avenue of the fountains. So, what we're asking for here is an increase in the contract amount for the term. Very similar to the last one, just different circumstances. Councilwoman Larby. Thank you, Mayor.

I'd like to just move to approve the award of job order contracting electrical services agreements not to exceed 150,000 per year. Second, Councilman Watts. Justin, I assume we have that same schedule of values for various services that you talked about with uh the prior issues, Mr. Mayor, Council Member, that is correct. And does that include markup on parts or discounts off a list? Do we have a materials markup as well? We we allow for a percentage on the markup.

A a percentage of markup on their costs or on list prices on their cost. So administrative service 10 15% somewhere in that area. I don't think it's quite that high. I don't have the number in front of me, but we rarely do we we go that high. It's usually considerably less than that. Okay. And each individual contractor will be given a clear scope and then they'll be able to send that back and they'll note any of their increases there for handling fees for lack of a better description.

Thank you. You're welcome. Town clerk, are there any speaker cards on this one? No, there is not. We have a motion and a second. Can we get a roll call, please? Council member McMahon, I. Council member Laravey, I. Council member Earl, I. Council member Calibian. Hi. Council member Watts. Hi. Vice Mayor Skilicorn. No. Mayor Fidell. I. Motion passes 6 to1. Thank you. Item G is consideration uh possible action with the cities and towns legislative bulletin.

Is there any any discussion on anything that we heard on the call today? Councilman Watts. back on buttons. The good news was there was no there has been no activity on sales tax on food. It's kind of been suspended for the time being which is good news. Yeah. Okay. Having no other discussion then we'll move on to the call to the public. Uh town clerk, do we have any speaker cards? Yes, mayor. We received one.

Um, Matthew Corrian, mayor, council, thank to address uh one thing, this call to the public. I know that uh the November meeting we had uh quite a bit of disruption, chaos, um profanity, disorderly conduct to the to the extent that the room actually had to be cleared after a recess was taken. Uh the mayor made the determination that this type of disorderly conduct did not really fit the parameters of free speech. More like uh rioting or outburst. That's my opinion.

And uh so his determination was to clear the room to move that uh meeting to the video part or the exterior clearing the room. I think uh maybe it was for safety reasons and also to conduct business for the town and I just commend that decision but mostly I commend the decision to bring back call to the public toward the end of the meeting so that that could be controlled number one.

Number two, taking care of town business is a priority and I compliment everyone on taking care of that first and then hearing from members of the community to address their concerns. So, just uh a commendation to the mayor and the council for bringing that back and doing it uh pretty swiftly really after the no I'll call it November chaos. Thank you. Thank you. Are there any other speakers? Uh down clear. No, there is not. Okay. Um is there any uh council direction to the town manager?

Any uh future agenda items, Councilwoman Larby? Thank you, Mayor. Um, I just have one and I think it's been proposed before, but I um I believe I have some proposed language that I can share with our town manager to add to our group home ordinance regarding inspections. Um, we had discussed possibly doing it before and then we were kind of waiting on the state legislature. It was a little up in the air and I believe I have language that would be helpful for us.

So, I'd like to add that to a future agenda. I'll second that. I I would support hearing that. Thank you. Um, if I may, I believe this is on our radar as a staff too. Um, so that is something we've been working towards, I believe, between legal team as well as John. So, um, happy to take that and make sure that that is all in alignment as we bring that item back later this spring. Perfect. Thank you. Anything else from anyone? Can I get a motion to adjurnn? Second. All in favor? I