
Prescott approves three water applications for hotel, shopping center, campus housing despite demolition safety concerns
Council approved three water service applications for major developments (downtown hotel, shopping center, campus housing) amid significant controversies over plaza hotel demolition, privacy concerns with surveillance cameras, and rodeo fairgrounds master plan delays.
Prescott Approves High-Stakes Water Service Applications Amid Demolition Safety Dispute, Fairgrounds Crisis, and Privacy Revolt
The Prescott City Council on April 14, 2026, approved three water service applications for major developments but granted hard-won conditions to the most controversial project—a downtown hotel demolition on Whiskey Row that faces a pending lawsuit, structural risks to adjacent protected buildings, and fierce opposition from local business owners. The meeting exposed deep tensions between state preemption law that strips city transparency, municipal liability fears, and applicants' desires to move forward.
Key Speeches
"Never in 45 years of speaking with the public on Whiskey Row have so many residents and visitors confronted me with a single issue as have confronted me with, 'How do you feel about the new hotel?' Never have I heard as solidly negative public discourse on an issue. Everybody's hometown hates this project." — John Loots, Van Goier Art Gallery, 45-year Whiskey Row business owner
"The question before you today is the water services agreement. It's not a question of the use. It's not a question of the structural engineering of the building. Those are separate questions, many of which have been settled, particularly the use and design of the building. But the other items related to permitting can be addressed at a later date." — Alex Hayes, Withey Morris, PLC, applicant's attorney
"You're going down rabbit holes just because you don't want to approve the hotel. We're here to approve the water service application and nothing else." — Ted Gambogi
"This is a benefit to the city's economy. And this council seems to find every reason known to mankind why not to do it." — Ted Gambogi (supporting Commerce Construction Shopping Center)
Timeline
Prescott Plaza Hotel (WSA25-037):
- Staff presentation: Brian Reese, Water Resources Manager, summarized a 47-room four-story hotel project at 136 South Montezuma Street with estimated potable water demand of 5.6 acre feet per year. Historical usage: 0.1 acre feet. Total estimated demand: 5.5 acre feet per year. Non-residential water budget available: 24.3 acre feet.
- Water Subcommittee vote: 1-1-1 (one yes, one no, one abstain on March 3, 2026).
- Council discussion: Mayor Cathey Rusing raised legal and safety concerns about the pending lawsuit challenging the four-story height restriction, adjacent building damage risks, and the impact of HB2447 state law eliminating public input on planning and zoning decisions. City Attorney Joseph Young clarified that the lawsuit could force a redesign if the court ruled four stories unlawful but would not affect council's water vote. Chelsea Walton, Community Development Director, confirmed structural engineering is required by the 2024 International Building Code but can be added as a stipulation. Ted Gambogi pushed for voluntary proof of insurance. Council Member Mary Frederickson and others expressed skepticism about the lack of transparency due to state preemption. Ted Gambogi moved to approve with the stipulation; the motion passed 6-0-1 (Jay Ruby abstained).
- Public comment: John Loots documented unprecedented negative community sentiment and warned of potential litigation over business losses from construction disruption. No formal demolition agreement exists, though code requires structural mitigation.
Commerce Construction Shopping Center (WSA26-00002):
- Staff presentation: 370,000-square-foot commercial/retail complex at SR89 and Jenna Lane with estimated potable water demand of 20.3 acre feet per year and landscape demand of 7.6 acre feet per year, totaling 27.9 acre feet per year. Project requested an appeal of the 50% water budget rule because the demand exceeds 50% of the remaining semi-annual budget. Economic benefits cited: $135.8 million in sales, $4 million revenue to city, 790 retail and restaurant jobs, property tax contribution of $580,800 annually.
- Water Subcommittee recommendation: Approved appeal forwarding to council (March 3, 2026).
- Council discussion: Mayor Pro Tem Lois Fruhwirth celebrated the project as the "first major shopping center in north Prescott since Costco and Trader Joe's," noting the 12-to-18-month construction phase and long-term developer commitment. Councilman Jim Garing framed it as essential infrastructure for 10,000–15,000 new homes in the northern growth area and invoked a comparable underground storm water storage requirement his consulting city is implementing. Mary Frederickson asked about Prescott share of the property tax revenue (city manager later estimated approximately $1 million annually citywide). Walt Kosar, public commenter, asked why treated effluent from the airport treatment plant was not being used for irrigation. Jim Hardison (Commerce Construction) explained that dry well technology—preferred for aquifer recharge—is not currently allowed under city code but could be deployed if code is amended. Jay Ruby renewed his call for a city code update establishing mandatory stormwater recharge requirements for large developments. Ted Gambogi sought wage estimates for the 790 jobs (not provided in the white paper). Motion passed 7-0.
- Public comment: Walt Kosar supported the project and suggested integration of storm water capture and treated effluent use for irrigation.
Embry Riddle Campus Housing (WSA25-060):
- Staff presentation: 16-unit residential campus housing project estimated to consume 1.92 acre feet per year for buildings and 0.7 acre feet for landscape (after removal of turf per water subcommittee condition), totaling 2.62 acre feet per year. Residential budget available: 16.5 acre feet.
- Water Subcommittee condition: Turf removal (interpreted as natural grass; artificial turf acceptable). Applicant agreed.
- Council discussion: Jay Ruby asked Brad (Embry Riddle Facilities Director) why a state-of-the-art university was not modeling stormwater catchment systems. Brad responded that budget and schedule constraints required focus on code-compliant detention, but the university is willing to discuss a watershed-level approach and dry well technology if code permits. Jay Ruby emphasized that this is water awareness month and that evaporation in Prescott exceeds 40 feet per year, making East Coast detention ponds inadequate for aquifer recharge. The city lacks a formal stormwater recharge code. Motion passed 6-0-1 (Jay Ruby abstained).
Opposition
Prescott Plaza Hotel Opposition:
- Number of speakers against: 1 major speaker (John Loots); 10 open-call speakers addressing various topics including rodeo fairgrounds, Flock cameras, and accountability.
- Main concerns:
- Construction disruption and sidewalk closures will damage Whiskey Row business revenue; prior city council approved this in "9th hour" without adequate due diligence.
- No setbacks and no on-site staging area; adjacent businesses will bear the cost of construction impact.
- Pending lawsuit questions legality of four-story height; council does not yet know if project will be three or four stories.
- HB2447 state preemption law stripped public and planning commission input; council must do heightened due diligence.
- Structural risk to adjacent protected buildings; no feasibility study or engineer on-site inspection commitment.
- Liability and insurance coverage unclear; Whiskey Row businesses may sue city for damages.
- Most compelling argument: John Loots documented that in 45 years of Whiskey Row business ownership, never before have residents and visitors confronted him so uniformly and negatively on a single issue. He invoked major metropolitan precedent showing that site-restricted construction is typically borne by the developer, not the surrounding business community.
- Organized opposition: Van Goier Art Gallery (Loots), implicit coalition of Whiskey Row business owners discussing potential litigation and financial accountability.
Broader Controversies (Public Comment):
- Rodeo Fairgrounds Master Plan: Earl Duket (steering committee member) and Levi Darby (Yavapai County Fair chairman) condemned the master plan postponement as procedural theater. Cost estimates jumped from $60 million to $142 million immediately before the meeting was cancelled without steering committee deliberation. Darby criticized GH2 consultants for missing stakeholder input (Yavapai County Fair not on steering committee until last week), misaligning building placement with actual rodeo operations (warm-up arenas separated from animals by large distance), and proposing incompatible amenities (dog parks, swimming pool, asphalt parking lot harmful to horses). Truly Bracken added that environmental mitigation (biological treatment basins, composting for manure) is being sidelined in favor of building placement and may be unfundable if deferred to permitting.
- Flock ALPR Cameras and AI Facial Recognition: Gary Stewart documented connections to 13 private equity firms and a CEO under criminal investigation for hacking an underage girls' gymnasium. He warned that all Flock cameras feed facial recognition data to a global AI training system before police receive footage, data is retained indefinitely despite police claims of three-week deletion, and the system violates privacy under Arizona Constitution Article 2 Section 8. Kenneth Colner cited Carpenter v. United States Supreme Court precedent holding that tracking movements over time without a warrant constitutes a Fourth Amendment violation; he noted that Flock effectively presumes guilt by surveilling everyone, requiring no "reasonable articulable suspicion" (RAS) of crime, and that an unpublished email from Chief of Police Amy Bonnie expressed concern about "conspiracy theorist" reactions and acknowledged the system's traffic-counting and road-planning utility beyond crime detection—contradicting the "crime only" justification.
Support
Commerce Construction Shopping Center:
- Number of speakers in favor: Jim Garing, Lois Fruhwirth, Gamboji, Patrick Grady, and Mary Frederickson; Tom Kalino (Majestic Realty, owner); Jim Hardison (Commerce Construction).
- Key arguments:
- Northern Prescott growth is inevitable; 10,000–15,000 new homes will need retail services close by, reducing traffic on SR89, 69, and Willow Creek Road.
- First major shopping center in north Prescott since Costco and Trader Joe's; generates $135.8 million in sales, $4 million city revenue, 790 jobs.
- Majestic Realty's long-term hold business model means developer will remain community stakeholder and participate in charitable projects.
- Strategic plan priorities include economic development and retail services in high-growth area.
- Non-residential water budget has never been fully used in two-and-a-half-year history of water subcommittee; 28 acre feet vs. typical 25 is manageable.
- Dry well technology could enable future stormwater recharge if city code is updated; applicant willing to implement.
- Most compelling support: Jim Garing invoked precedent from his consulting city requiring underground storm water storage and framed the project as both inevitable and strategically essential. Lois Fruhwirth emphasized the 12–18-month construction timeline and long-term developer commitment vs. spec-and-flip risk.
Prescott Plaza Hotel:
- Number of speakers in favor: Ted Gambogi; attorney Alex Hayes (Withey Morris, PLC).
- Key arguments:
- Water approval does not approve the use, design, or building engineering; those are separate permitting questions to be addressed later.
- Structural engineering is already required by the 2024 International Building Code; no need to redundantly stipulate it.
- The freestanding hotel structure will not rely on adjacent buildings for support; when the existing roof beam comes down, adjacent buildings will become stronger, not weaker.
- Council is retreating from prior council's approval due to discomfort with the project, not legal or procedural grounds.
- Pending lawsuit will be resolved within the permitting timeline; no injunction has yet issued.
- Insurance is routine in construction and will be in place as a business necessity; voluntary compliance sufficient.
- Most compelling support: Councilman Gamboji's assertion that the council is using water approval procedurally to second-guess a prior council decision and that the current discussion veers into permitting minutiae beyond water authority.
Project Details
Prescott Plaza Hotel (WSA25-037):
- Case number: WSA25-037
- Applicant / developer: James Graette
- Attorney: Alex Hayes, Withey Morris, PLC (2121 East Highland Avenue)
- Location / address: 136, 138, 140 South Montezuma Street, downtown Prescott
- APN: 109-2-14A
- Current zoning → Proposed zoning: Not stated in transcript.
- Density / units / square footage: 47 hotel rooms, four-story building (height in dispute pending lawsuit).
- Water demand: 5.6 acre feet per year (building); 0 acre feet (no landscape); historical 0.1 acre feet per year; net new demand: 5.5 acre feet per year.
- Pending litigation: Lawsuit questioning legality of four-story height restriction; outcome unknown but may require redesign to three stories.
- Conditions attached: Structural engineer feasibility study prior to demolition; on-site structural engineer during construction.
Commerce Construction Shopping Center (WSA26-00002):
- Case number: WSA26-00002
- Applicant / developer: Commerce Construction Co. LP; owner: Majestic Realty (Tom Kalino)
- Attorney: Not stated in transcript.
- Location / address: State Route 89 and Jenna Lane, north Prescott (Deep Well master plan area)
- APN: 102-05-033H
- Current zoning → Proposed zoning: Not stated in transcript.
- Density / units / square footage: Approximately 370,000 square feet of commercial/retail use.
- Water demand: 20.3 acre feet per year (buildings); 7.6 acre feet per year (landscape); total 27.9 acre feet per year.
- Economic benefits: $135.8 million estimated annual sales; $4 million city revenue; 790 retail and restaurant jobs; $580,800 annual property tax (shared with all regional taxing jurisdictions; city's share approximately $1 million citywide annually, per city manager estimate during discussion).
- Construction timeline: 12–18 months.
- Developer commitment: Long-term hold (no spec-and-flip model); $90 million regional portfolio across country; regional office in Phoenix.
- Changes from prior version: Appeal of 50% water budget rule granted by council.
Embry Riddle Campus Housing (WSA25-060):
- Case number: WSA25-060
- Applicant / developer: Embry Riddle Aeronautical University; facilities director: Brad
- Attorney: Not stated in transcript.
- Location / address: Portion of APN 106-3-00004, T14NR02W Section 03 Southeast 14 (Embry Riddle campus)
- APN: 106-3-00004
- Current zoning → Proposed zoning: Not stated in transcript.
- Density / units / square footage: 16 residential units (four buildings, four units per building).
- Water demand: 1.92 acre feet per year (buildings); 0.7 acre feet per year (landscape, no turf); total 2.62 acre feet per year.
- Conditions attached: Removal of turf (natural grass) from landscape plan; artificial turf acceptable. Voluntary commitment to watershed-level stormwater approach and dry well technology if code permits.
Vote Breakdown
WSA25-060 (Embry Riddle Campus Housing):
- Final: 6-0-1 (passed)
- Yes: Cathey Rusing, Lois Fruhwirth, Mary Frederickson, Gamboji, Jim Garing, Patrick Grady
- No: None
- Abstentions: Jay Ruby
WSA26-00002 (Commerce Construction Shopping Center):
- Final: 7-0 (passed)
- Yes: Cathey Rusing, Lois Fruhwirth, Mary Frederickson, Gamboji, Jim Garing, Patrick Grady, Jay Ruby
- No: None
- Abstentions: None
WSA25-037 (Prescott Plaza Hotel):
- Final: 6-0-1 (passed)
- Yes: Lois Fruhwirth, Mary Frederickson, Jim Garing, Patrick Grady, Gamboji, Cathey Rusing
- No: None
- Abstentions: Jay Ruby
Outcome & Next Steps
Prescott Plaza Hotel: Water service approved with conditions requiring (1) structural engineer feasibility study prior to demolition to assess risk to adjacent protected buildings, and (2) on-site structural engineer during construction to ensure code compliance and mitigation of adjacent property damage. Project must still resolve pending lawsuit challenging four-story height restriction (resolution expected within permitting timeline). Demolition and building permits will follow water approval. Applicant encouraged to submit voluntary proof of insurance and to work closely with adjacent Whiskey Row businesses on communication and phasing.
Commerce Construction Shopping Center: Water service approved with appeal of 50% budget rule granted. Developer authorized to proceed with project planning and permitting. Water allocation tracked separately at year-end; does not reduce regular annual budget. Council encouraged to expedite city code updates on stormwater recharge (dry well technology) to enable future applicants to implement best practices.
Embry Riddle Campus Housing: Water service approved. Applicant encouraged to pursue watershed-level stormwater management and dry well technology in future phases if code permits; no mandate for this project due to budget and schedule constraints.
Rodeo Fairgrounds Master Plan: Meeting postponed from April 20 to early June. Steering committee asked to reassess process transparency and address concerns about GH2 consultant alignment with actual rodeo operations. Cost estimate jump from $60 million to $142 million to be discussed. Yavapai County Fair now seated on steering committee (was missing previously).
Strickland Park Stormwater Project: City agreed to reschedule community meeting (originally April 15) due to inadequate notice (8.5" x 11" sign on opposite side of park sign; poor visibility). New meeting to include proper public notice and outreach to affected neighborhoods.
Flock ALPR Camera System: No formal council action taken. Public comment recorded. Privacy and constitutional concerns documented for future council consideration if item reaches formal agenda.
Controversies & Context
HB2447 State Preemption and Transparency Crisis: Mayor Cathey Rusing and Ted Gambogi both referenced HB2447, an Arizona law effective January 1, 2026, that strips city councils and planning commissions of authority to hold public hearings on certain development applications. This forces cities to approve or deny applications based solely on code compliance, eliminating discretionary review and public comment periods. For the Prescott Plaza Hotel—a high-visibility downtown demolition with pending litigation—the loss of traditional planning commission and city council discretion has forced council members into the uncomfortable position of approving water service now and deferring all other scrutiny to administrative permitting, despite community opposition unprecedented in 45 years (per Loots). City Attorney Joseph Young clarified that council can attach stipulations to water approval (e.g., structural engineer) as a workaround but acknowledged the constraints.
Structural Engineering and Adjacent Building Liability: The Prescott Plaza Hotel demolition involves two adjacent buildings (presumably the Van Goier Art Gallery and another business) that appear to be structurally connected or dependent on shared foundations and beams with the demolished structure. No formal feasibility study or engineer-on-site protocol exists in current code, though the 2024 International Building Code requires structural calculations. Chelsea Walton (Community Development Director) confirmed these are standard permitting requirements but can be imposed as conditions to water approval. The stipulation was added after Ted Gambogi raised concern that the city could be named in litigation if adjacent buildings are damaged. City Attorney Young cautioned that water approval does not shield the city from suit but that the developer/property owner bears liability, not the city. However, Cathey Rusing insisted on seeing proof that the city is indemnified, suggesting lingering discomfort.
State Water Policy and Aquifer Recharge: Two of the three water applications (Commerce Construction and Embry Riddle) sparked intense discussion about stormwater capture and recharge. Councilman Jay Ruby noted that Prescott's evaporation rate is ~40 feet per year, making traditional detention ponds (designed for flood control, not recharge) inadequate. Jim Hardison (Commerce Construction) explained that dry well technology—which returns storm water to the aquifer—is not currently permitted under Prescott city code, though it is standard in Phoenix and other Arizona municipalities. Jay Ruby seized on both applications to call for expedited city code amendments establishing mandatory stormwater recharge for large developments, framing this as urgent during "water awareness month" and consistent with the city's long-term water conservation goal. No formal code amendment was initiated, but council acknowledged the need.
Rodeo Fairgrounds Master Plan: Transparency and Cost Shock: The April 14 meeting revealed that the rodeo fairgrounds master plan community meeting (scheduled for April 20) was postponed to early June without steering committee deliberation, immediately following release of cost estimates in the local paper showing a jump from $60 million to $142 million. Earl Duket (steering committee member) warned that this timing "reinforces a growing concern" that the steering committee and public input are "merely procedural steps to check off" rather than "meaningful parts of a decision-making process." He invoked the space shuttle Challenger and Three Mile Island accidents to argue that ignoring data and disrupting process increases risk of bad outcomes. Levi Darby (Yavapai County Fair chairman, 15 years experience) criticized GH2 consultants for fundamental misalignment with actual rodeo operations: warm-up arenas placed far from main arenas (how do animals cross?), no apparent understanding of rodeo heritage, proposals for incompatible amenities (swimming pool, dog parks, asphalt parking damaging to horses), and Yavapai County Fair not included on steering committee until last week despite being one of the "two biggest functions in Yavapai County." Truly Bracken added that environmental mitigation (biological treatment basins to remove nitrogen and phosphorus, manure composting systems) identified by city environmental staff as critical is being sidelined in favor of building placement and parking, and any deferred mitigation will be unfundable during permitting.
Privacy and Surveillance Concerns: Multiple residents (Gary Stewart, Kenneth Colner) raised serious constitutional objections to the Flock ALPR camera system with AI facial recognition. Gary Stewart documented connections to 13 private equity firms funded by tax dollars and cited a Flock CEO under criminal investigation for hacking an underage girls' gymnasium. He warned that footage goes to a global Flock AI system before police receive it, data is retained indefinitely despite police claims of three-week deletion, and children at the upcoming Earth Day event will be recorded in the global Flock facial recognition database. Kenneth Colner cited Arizona Constitution Article 2 Section 8 (explicit right to privacy) and Carpenter v. United States (warrantless tracking of movements violates the "privacies of life"). He argued that Flock effectively presumes guilt by surveilling all pedestrians and vehicles without reasonable articulable suspicion (RAS) of crime, violating due process. An unpublished email from Chief Amy Bonnie revealed concerns about "conspiracy theorist" reactions and acknowledged the system's utility for traffic-volume and road-planning analysis—contradicting the "crime only" justification. No formal council action was taken; the item was not on the posted agenda and remains under staff evaluation.
City Accountability Tracking and Governance Transparency: ION Prescott (Tony Hammer and Chad Dere) presented an accountability matrix tracking council members' campaign promises and public statements against reported progress. Only Councilman Jay Ruby submitted a progress report; all other council members "defaulted on their leadership responsibility." ION Prescott has syndicated council voting sessions on social media, generating 20,000+ views of a single January 16 moment, bringing constituent attention to council actions. Hammer and Dere emphasized that their platform is where constituents already gather and that council should embrace rather than avoid it. Both Tony Hammer and Jay Ruby were recognized by Chad Dere for stepping up to engage directly with the public, while other council members remained silent.
Duration
- Meeting total: Approximately 3.5–4 hours (exact duration not stated in transcript).
- Prescott Plaza Hotel item (WSA25-037): Approximately 45 minutes (including counsel discussion, city attorney input, community development director clarification, applicant presentation, and public comment).
- Commerce Construction Shopping Center (WSA26-00002): Approximately 30 minutes.
- Embry Riddle Campus Housing (WSA25-060): Approximately 20 minutes.
- Open Call to the Public: ~40 minutes allocated; 10 speakers on rodeo fairgrounds, Flock cameras, accountability, and SR89 project management.
Other Notable Items
Airport Land Designation (Resolution 2026-1980): Council unanimously adopted a resolution designating 75.38 acres adjacent to Prescott Regional Airport as official airport lands. Rick Crider (Airport Director) reported that state ($3.1 million), federal ($3 million), and settlement funds ($750,000) recovered 85.7% of the $8 million land purchase cost (previously 76.5% without settlement). Land will remain available for compatible economic development under airport management. Lois Fruhwirth emphasized that the settlement recovery was a solid line, not a dotted line, directly connected to the land acquisition dispute.
Hockey Rink Lighting at Pioneer Park (Item 8F): Council approved LED lighting upgrade with four 50-foot poles and automated timers tied to reservation system. Roller skating and roller derby communities (Stephanie Doss, Adrian representing 20-year-old roller derby program founded in 2008 and recreational hockey teams) expressed strong support, noting the rink is heavily used year-round and had deteriorated after nearby Wheelhouse facility closed. Council directed staff to explore surface repair budget requests.
Drill Tech Emergency Procurement (Item 8G): Council approved $12,300 emergency procurement for a specialized pump to restore Airport Well #5 (Chino Well #2, the second-largest city producer). Jay Ruby questioned a $4,500 markup ($7,800 listed by manufacturer vs. $12,300 actual cost) and asked about supplier relationships and control. Steve Wolfers (Utilities Manager) explained the cost includes labor, custom machine work, and modules beyond the pump itself; Drill Tech was chosen for proximity and responsiveness, and $100,000 total cost (vs. $200,000+ if sourced from Phoenix) was reasonable for emergency response. Well restoration was urgent because loss of Airport Well #5 left Chino Well #2 as the only large remaining producer, creating supply risk.