Goodyear approves QuikTrip 24-hour convenience store and gas station near Pebble Creek despite resident opposition
GOODYEAR, ARIZONA — July 8, 2024

Goodyear approves QuikTrip 24-hour convenience store and gas station near Pebble Creek despite resident opposition

City Council approved Quick Trip's controversial 24-hour convenience store and gas station near Pebble Creek senior community despite significant opposition, approved mini storage zoning streamlining, and authorized annexation discussions for a major solar/battery storage project while addressing concerns about prior problematic annexation.


Goodyear Council Approves QuikTrip Corporation Near Senior Community 7-0 as Opposition Grows; Also Authorizes Solar Project Annexation Talks and Mini Storage Deregulation

The Goodyear City Council's July 8, 2024 meeting—marked by emotional testimony from over 200 residents opposing a convenience store and gas station—resulted in unanimous approval of the QuikTrip Corporation use permit, a zoning streamlining measure, and authorization for staff to negotiate a controversial 830-acre annexation for a solar and battery storage facility. The council heard two hours of public comment dominated by Pebble Creek active adult residents demanding hour restrictions, sound walls, and security measures to mitigate noise, air pollution, and crime risks. All seven council members sided with the applicant.

Key Speeches

"We read the meeting minutes from the Prior Circle K case. We've had two neighborhood meetings and we had Planning Commission meetings. We know what the issues are. The truck stops been resolved with stipulations. The traffic study shows that there's minimal new trips that will be generated on Indian School Road and there's a vast amount of capacity on that road to serve the site." — Brian Greathouse, attorney representing QuikTrip Corporation

"I chose Goodyear as my place to retire in part because of its designation as an All-American City. I knew that meant good schools low crime beautiful parks and plan development. Many businesses would be acceptable uses and welcomed by our residents but not businesses that operate 24 hours a day 7 days a week have fueling stations or drive-throughs with idling cars that create air light and noise pollution along with increased crime and traffic." — Jackie Brandt, Pebble Creek resident

"I think it's reasonable to believe that closing it down between midnight and 5 6 a.m. is what I'm asking for. Nothing good happens after midnight." — Sandra Clinton, retired criminal justice attorney and Goodyear resident

"I've been in criminal justice for 30 years and anyone who's ever gotten with the city of Phoenix and gone on a third shift ride along, the officers they'd bring their little coffee with them and they would go in there and they'd know the guy who was there and everything. We don't have those type of stations here so when I talked to the attorney about quick trip he goes yeah we welcome First Responders to go in there." — Council Member Laura Kaino

Timeline

QuikTrip Corporation Use Permit

Mini Storage Text Amendment

Rainbow Valley Energy Storage & Solar Annexation Authorization

Opposition

QuikTrip Corporation Opposition:

Support

QuikTrip Corporation Support:

Project Details

QuikTrip Corporation Convenience Store & Gas Station

Mini Storage Text Amendment

Rainbow Valley Energy Storage & Solar Annexation

Vote Breakdown

QuikTrip Corporation Use Permit

Mini Storage Text Amendment

Rainbow Valley Annexation Authorization

Consent Agenda (Items 1–15)

Microsoft Booster Station Fifth Amendment

Rainbow Valley Water Reclamation Facility GMP2

Rainbow Valley RWRF Development Agreement

Outcome & Next Steps

QuikTrip Corporation: Approved with stipulations: (1) prohibition of truck stop and travel center facilities; (2) prohibition of semi-truck overnight parking and overnight parking accommodations. No hour restrictions, no sound wall requirement, no security guard mandate. Applicant may proceed to site plan and permitting.

Mini Storage: Text amendment effective 30 days from adoption. Mini storage in C1, C2, I1, I2 no longer requires special use permit if criteria met; deviations route to public hearing. Design guidelines and clustering rules codified.

Rainbow Valley Annexation: Staff authorized to initiate annexation process. Next steps: (1) pre-annexation development agreement negotiation between city (Katie Weilin, staff), applicant (Jordan Rose), and attorney (to address infrastructure, roads, water, fire/EMS, costs); (2) blank petition gathering (51% property owner signatures required by law, but applicant/city targeting 100%); (3) future City Council hearing on annexation ordinance with public notice and hearing; (4) separate special use permit process for solar facility (concurrent). Council deferred final annexation approval pending agreement review. No commitment to approve.

Microsoft Booster Station: Fifth Amendment approved. City will operate booster station 8 during Microsoft development on adjacent site. Microsoft funds $3.5M+ escrow for replacement facility design/construction at site 18 (location of three city wells). City pays for operational improvements from sewer enterprise funds (~$15 million). Cost-share: Harvard/Microsoft 2/3, City 1/3; true-up at project end.

Harvard/Rainbow Valley RWRF Expansion: GMP2 ($7.75M) approved for long-lead items (aluminum odor-control covers, mechanical equipment). Project timeline: capacity expansion by Dec. 31, 2026; operational improvements by June 30, 2027. Development agreement approved. City acquires $15M of capacity; Harvard 2/3, City 1/3 cost-share. Odor easement reduced from 1,000 ft to 350 ft due to controls.

Controversies & Context

QuikTrip Corporation & Pebble Creek:

The deepest controversy was the council's approval of the QuikTrip Corporation use permit over sustained opposition from Pebble Creek's active adult population (11,000+ residents). Residents invoked a prior petition of 1,100+ signatures against a Circle K proposal in 2023, arguing that 24/7 convenience stores and gas stations are inherently incompatible with a senior recreational community. Key tensions included:

Mobile Annexation Precedent:

All three major items (QuikTrip Corporation, mini storage, Rainbow Valley) were colored by the council's awareness of the Mobile annexation (approved circa 2008), which promised residential, commercial, school, library, and connector roads but largely failed to materialize. Council Member Wally Campbell was adamantly opposed to any further annexation, citing annual millions in police and fire costs for undeveloped land. Brannon Hampton and others pushed for hard protections (pre-annexation development agreements with escrow/bonding, not just promises) and deferred approval pending detailed negotiations. Jordan Rose and staff emphasized that current council leadership (Weilin, others) had learned from Mobile's mistakes and would impose strict conditions. This debate underscored the city's fiscal vulnerability and the need for legally binding mechanisms (not just developer pledges) to ensure infrastructure and cost obligations are met.

Mini Storage Public Input Trade-off:

Council Member Stottler raised the concern that codifying mini storage criteria (removing the need for a special use permit) eliminates public hearings for residents backing up to residential property. While Williams explained that rezoning those parcels would still trigger hearings and that stipulations were drawn from prior cases, Stottler and others expressed unease about silently permitting storage facilities near homes. Brannon Hampton asked if a threshold of resident complaints could trigger a hearing; Williams said no. This represents a policy trade-off: developers gain certainty and faster approval, but residents lose a formal avenue to contest facilities that meet the new minimum standards—a tension the council acknowledged but did not resolve.

Battery Storage Fire Safety Unknowns:

Brannon Hampton and others raised concerns about the nascent science of lithium-ion battery storage fire suppression. An APS facility at Flagstaff burned down within a week of completion. The Rainbow Valley project includes both solar and battery storage components on remote land with limited water access. While Jordan Rose committed to working with Fire Chief Louisy to address the concern via pre-annexation development agreement, the council left unresolved what happens if a battery fire occurs, what water is available, how mutual aid (25+ minutes away) factors in, and whether the applicant or city bears risk/liability if an emergency event overwhelms local fire capacity.

Duration

Other Notable Items

Consent Agenda (Items 1–15): Routine approvals including plot plats, annexation initiation (Lichfield Road), school resource officer intergovernmental agreements, sidewalk easement termination, and infrastructure projects. Laura Kaino highlighted two pass-through items: (1) Item 12—American Rescue Plan Act affordable housing partnership with county (described as "flying under the radar" but significant for expanding Goodyear's affordable housing capacity); (2) Item 15—water service agreement with Olam Phoenix (Epicore) to provide service to area outside city limits, expanding the city's commercial footprint without annexation.

Microsoft Fifth Amendment (Booster Station 8): Approved 7-0. Microsoft will fund $3.5M+ escrow account for city to design and build replacement booster station at site 18, where city has three wells and treatment. Microsoft will demolish existing facility and purchase land. City pays ~$15M of operational improvements from sewer enterprise fund. Represents continuation of long-standing development agreement (first signed December 2018) showing stable partnership with data center operator.

Harvard/Rainbow Valley Water Reclamation Facility Expansion: Approved 7-0. GMP2 contract amendment ($7.75M) and development agreement authorize expansion from 750,000 gpd to 2 million gpd (1.25M gpd increase). Addresses capacity constraints as Australia/Cantamia grow and flood-plane challenges. Council member Stottler praised the partnership with Harvard, noting improved design standards and avoiding the "minimum standards" approach. The project unlocks future capacity for city-controlled effluent use or sale (Harvard has first right of refusal). Represents proactive infrastructure investment to support regional growth.