
Goodyear approves $12.4M Australia Parkway interchange, $818.9M budget, business licensing overhaul
City Council approved a $12.4M Australia Parkway interchange project, business license ordinance with amendments to address casual sales, truck parking facility rezoning, and $818.9M FY2025 budget, while acknowledging ongoing regulatory gaps for sober living homes.
Goodyear Council Balances $12.4M Interchange Overrun Against Fiscal Conservatism as Sober Living Home Regulation Remains Incomplete
The Goodyear City Council held a notably robust May 20, 2024 meeting marked by unanimous votes on major capital and operational initiatives, yet an undercurrent of frustration surfaced over the adequacy of enforcement tools for a persistent problem: unlicensed and fraudulent sober living homes operating in the city for nearly five years without council awareness or intervention.
The council approved a 57% budget increase for the Australia Parkway/Pebble Creek Parkway I-10 interchange project, adopted a business licensing ordinance with last-minute amendments, rezoned a 5.6-acre parcel for truck parking, and passed an $818.966 million tentative FY2025 budget. All four items passed 7–0. Yet beneath the unanimity lay sharp disagreement about whether the business licensing framework—the primary tool intended to address sober living home abuses—will prove sufficient without a dedicated ordinance.
Key Speeches
"The primary impact to the budget is due to escalation and cost of construction which we're seeing across the board on these types of projects." — Steve Certo, City Engineer
"When we have an increase of almost 50% on a project I don't think we should just be hand waving this on a consent we probably need to shed some transparency on it." — Council Member Stipp
"I don't feel that this is going to take care of our problem and I think we're going to have to take another look at it." — Wally Campbell
"I think we need to direct the staff to come up with a viable solution to the sober living home situation and bring that to us. There are seven varying opinions on how this needs to be done and there are only as far as I know two experts in this community that understand that and they both reside in the police department." — Council Member Stipp
"This is not a sober living home ordinance it's an ordinance of General applicability." — Rok Massi, City Attorney
Timeline
Australia Parkway/Pebble Creek Parkway I-10 Interchange Expansion
- Applicant presentation: Steve Certo (City Engineer) and Logan Hop (Senior Project Manager) presented the scope: expansion to three lanes in each direction under the freeway, dual left turns in both directions to enter I-10, dedicated right turns in both directions. Original budget: $7.9M. Requested increase: $4.5M to $12.4M total. Low bid: $10.8M; second bid: $11.1–11.2M. Primary drivers: construction cost escalation and required night work to maintain traffic flow and meet schedule.
- Staff recommendation: Approval of contract and budget transfer, contingent on coordination with other CIP projects to ensure north-south routing remains available during construction.
- Public comment: None.
- Council discussion: Wally Campbell asked about the second bidder, night closures, and traffic rerouting. Brannon Hampton confirmed night work strategy and requested coordination to avoid simultaneous construction under State Route 85 and Bullard. Council Member Stipp noted that ADOT has seen 55% cost increases since 2021 and that other Valley cities (Scottsdale, Phoenix) have experienced 50–60% increases in CIP costs. He emphasized the need to ensure future CIP estimates account for this escalation and pulled the item from consent for transparency, noting that a 50% increase deserved public scrutiny. Brannon Hampton raised the historical context: in the early 2000s, Goodyear relinquished access to MAG (Maricopa Association of Governments) arterial funding to enable I-10 widening; Proposition 479, on November ballots, would restore that access.
- Vote: 7–0.
Business License Program Ordinance Amendment (Ordinance 2024-1608)
- Applicant presentation: Rok Massi, City Attorney, presented the conversion from a business registration program to a business license program, noting that previous council feedback had prompted additional exemptions for homebased businesses and casual sales.
- Staff recommendation: Approval as amended.
- Public comment: None.
- Council discussion: Laura Kaino expressed concern that a $5,000 annual-sales threshold to define "casual business" might inadvertently require residents to provide financial information and create enforcement burdens. She proposed eliminating the dollar threshold and using days-of-operation instead. Rok Massi agreed, offering that cities often define casual sales by the number of event days (e.g., 5, 7, or 10 days annually). Brannon Hampton asked about proof-of-license requirements and military spouses operating under out-of-state licenses; Massi confirmed that administrative policy (not the ordinance) would require proof and that out-of-state licenses would be acceptable if they show the operator is licensed to conduct business. Wally Campbell asked whether the ordinance was designed to address sober living homes. Massi confirmed the ordinance was identified as a tool after discovering the city lacked a business license mechanism to regulate them, but acknowledged this was not a sober living homes ordinance. Wally Campbell stated bluntly: "I don't feel that this is going to take care of our problem and I think we're going to have to take another look at it."
Wally Campbell recounted that she had met with an officer (later identified as Scott Daniels from the police department) who informed her that the city had known about sober living home issues since 2019 but that council had not been made aware until the story "blew up in the newspaper." She cited Glendale, Gilbert, and Surprise ordinances as models and expressed concern that without tougher enforcement and separate regulation, "they're just going to ship their people to us because they're not going to ship our people." She reserved the right to revisit the topic and insisted that unlicensed homes provide proof of state licensing or be denied Goodyear business licenses. She also insisted that homes cannot simply expel residents into homelessness—they must arrange alternative placement.
Council Member Stipp separated the business licensing discussion from the sober living homes discussion, calling the former "a general ordinance of General applicability" and noting that "the whole conversation [about sober living] needs to kind of stop on this topic right here." He agreed with Laura Kaino proposal to strike the $5,000 threshold and suggested changing the casual event days from 2 to 10. Council Member Laurano supported the removal of the dollar threshold, noting concern about the "gig economy" and internet-based businesses that might not reach $5,000 in sales. Council Member Stipp then raised the criminal penalty question: Massi confirmed that repeated violations constitute a Class 1 misdemeanor, with penalties up to $2,500 per violation plus 80–90% surcharges, up to 3 years probation, and 6 months jail. Council Member Laurano asked whether $250 per day was sufficient punishment for "bad actors" making hundreds of thousands of dollars monthly. Massi acknowledged that for truly unlicensed operators already committing fraud, a business license requirement is merely a tool to prosecute them for operating without one—they would not voluntarily register.
Vicki Gillis expressed frustration that the sober living homes issue, originally raised as the rationale for the business licensing ordinance, had not been adequately discussed with council. She credited Ashley Troyer (Fire Department) and Scott Daniels (Police Department) with five years of work on the issue and noted that their absence from the council discussion was problematic. She reiterated her prior statements that council needed to hear from these experts and emphasized that the bad actors pose a risk of dumping expelled residents onto Goodyear streets as homeless. Joe Pizzillo agreed that state agencies must also step up enforcement and noted that the Attorney General's office has prosecuted some sober living home operators.
After extended discussion, Council Member Stipp moved to amend the ordinance by striking the $5,000 threshold and increasing casual event days from 2 to 14 days. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously. Massi confirmed he would revise the ordinance to reflect the 14-day threshold.
- Vote: 7–0 (as amended).
D&D Trucking Facility Rezoning (Ordinance 2024-1610)
- Applicant presentation: Ian Dolmage, Principal Planner, presented a rezoning request from Joseph Osborne for approximately 5.6 acres near the Phoenix-Goodyear Airport, bounded by McDowell Road (north), future State Route 30 (south), Elliot Road (east), and Bullard Avenue (west). Current zoning: Planned Area Development (PAD) with underlying I-1 (light industrial). Proposed: I-2 (general industrial) with PAD overlay. The Microsoft Data Center rezoning in 2018 had split the original Airport Commerce Center PAD. The new parcel would facilitate truck parking and logistics. Staff identified no major concerns. PAD overlay would restrict uses causing noise, fumes, odor, or traffic impacts. Modified setbacks: front 25 ft (vs. 50 ft standard), sides 20 ft (vs. 30 ft standard), rear 50 ft (maintained). Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5–0 for approval.
- Staff recommendation: Approval.
- Public comment: None.
- Council discussion: Council Member Stipp applauded the project as addressing a regional need for designated truck parking (as opposed to ad-hoc parking on roadways like Camelback east of El Mirage). He noted the site's proximity to I-10, SR-85, and future SR-30 and commended the developer for recognizing "the serious problem that we have in this region." Brannon Hampton sought clarification: would this be private parking for D&D Trucking's own fleet, or a commercial truck stop open to any operator? Arpon Taylor (Project Manager) indicated that D&D Trucking intends to park only its own company vehicles; drivers will not sleep overnight. Brannon Hampton asked about running diesel engines and overnight idling; Taylor confirmed no overnight sleeping is planned. Brannon Hampton noted 69 parking spaces and asked whether there were concerns about a nearby church or traffic impacts on Elliot Road. Dolmage confirmed the church is to the west and both facilities maintain separate parking. Brannon Hampton inquired about existing or planned traffic signals, CIP projects for Elliot Road widening, and truck turning radiuses on nearby arterials. Steve Certo (City Engineer) confirmed no near-term CIP projects for Elliot Road but noted that future projects would address turning radiuses and traffic control as needed. Brannon Hampton also asked whether cool-asphalt technology (ASU pilot program) might be considered; Certo noted the suggestion for future evaluation.
Council Member Stipp then expressed concern that the overlay restricts certain I-2 uses, but nothing in the ordinance explicitly limits the facility to D&D Trucking's own vehicles. He noted that in six months or six years, the owner could lease spaces to other trucking companies, generating commercial revenue. He clarified that he was not proposing a stipulation but simply wanted council to understand that the I-2 zoning does permit truck parking as a use and that the facility could evolve. Laura Kaino asked whether the overlay would prevent conversion to a "truck stop" (fueling, dining, other services). Dolmage indicated that the city does not have a definition of "truck stop" in its ordinance; the zoning silence and the city's definitions of service stations and gas stations do not encompass truck stop facilities. Massi noted that any future truck stop conversion would require a return to council for design review and potential amendments. Laura Kaino stated she would support approval only with a stipulation preventing truck stop conversion. Massi offered to add language if council desired additional security.
Laura Kaino expressed discomfort with the lack of an explicit prohibition but, after discussion, stated her concerns were addressed by the design-review process and the need to return to council for material changes. The council voted 7–0 for approval without a truck-stop stipulation.
- Vote: 7–0.
Fiscal Year 2025 Tentative Budget (Resolution 2024-2379)
- Applicant presentation: Ryan Biddle, Finance Manager, presented a tentative budget totaling $818.966 million. Key changes from the City Manager's recommended budget: (1) CIP and non-CIP carryovers ($247.3M in sources changes), including $4.5M for the Australia Parkway project and a reduction in land-purchase CIP from $13M to $6M (freeing $7M for contingency); (2) base budget adjustments for vacation/sick payouts and fire comp time; (3) no net change in FTE (two positions added, two removed); (4) contingency increase to $33M; and (5) property tax correction from Maricopa County (one-time adjustment related to prior-year assessment error). Biddle emphasized that carryovers are routine timing adjustments and that the tentative budget serves as an expenditure ceiling. Fire Department overtime budget: ~$2.4M ongoing. Police Department overtime: ~$2M. FY2025 CIP projects include Australia Parkway, Camelback Road, and wastewater expansion projects tied to the Strategic Plan. The legislature cut the city's rental tax (projected $5M loss) and other revenue streams, necessitating conservative budgeting.
- Staff recommendation: Approval of tentative budget and authorization for public hearings and publications.
- Public comment: None.
- Council discussion: Brannon Hampton expressed appreciation for the work sessions and the transparent process. Council Member Stipp, acknowledging this was his last tentative budget, praised staff but reiterated his concerns about long-term fiscal pressures. He noted that construction cost increases (35–55% across Arizona) were now baked into the city's experience and that the CIP team should apply these lessons to future projects. He asked whether project cost estimates had been adjusted for anticipated inflation; Biddle responded that the team is emphasizing scrutiny of near-term projects and will work to avoid repeating the Australia Parkway surprise. Stipp also asked whether it was time for a deeper audit-committee review of Fire and Police overtime budgets, noting that $4.5M in combined overtime is substantial. Biddle indicated that both departments are being monitored and that an MOU negotiation is planned for next year, but deferred to council on the necessity of additional reporting. Stipp suggested the audit committee consider reviewing whether management practices are driving unnecessary overtime. Council Member Laurano praised the staff and emphasized the budget's holistic approach, noting the inclusion of arts and culture events and public safety investments. She pointed out that 74 cities received $234M in combined legislative revenue cuts, whereas Goodyear received only $5M, a testament to fiscal prudence. She flagged the need to transition popular programs from one-time to ongoing funding by next fiscal year due to the rental tax loss. Joe Pizzillo reiterated the fiscal-conservative philosophy adopted since 2009: one-time funds for one-time expenses, ongoing funds for ongoing expenses. He acknowledged the $5M rental tax loss (potentially growing to $15M as apartments expand) and the challenge of covering popular programs without raising general fund allocations. Vicki Gillis thanked the entire team, particularly Ryan Biddle, for clarity and competence. Biddle also noted a supplemental for License Plate Reader cameras to be funded via RICO seizure funds, preserving general fund dollars for other purposes.
- Vote: 7–0.
Authorization of FY2025 Expenditures in Excess of $500,000 (Routine Spending)
- Staff presentation: Ryan Biddle explained that per Resolution 08-0255, all budgeted expenditures exceeding $500,000 require council approval. Tonight's motion authorizes all known routine, budgeted expenditures (utilities, fuel, insurance, custodial services, etc.) to be obligated without repetitive council authorization throughout the year.
- Vote: 7–0.
Opposition
No organized opposition was presented at the meeting. Public comment was limited to two speakers, neither of whom opposed the council agenda items.
Support
Australia Parkway Project: Council Member Stipp characterized the project as essential and widely supported, noting that "anybody who drives on Australia Parkway [Pebble Creek Parkway] would agree that this is probably the one project that we absolutely have to get done." Brannon Hampton confirmed the urgency and praised the night-work mitigation. No dissenting votes were recorded.
Business Licensing Ordinance: All seven council members voted in favor after amendment, though several expressed reservations about its sufficiency to address sober living homes. Support was framed as foundational to a broader regulatory framework rather than a complete solution.
Truck Parking Rezoning: Council Member Stipp's comment encapsulated support: the location is ideal, the use serves a regional need, and the project represents responsible private-sector contribution to solving a genuine problem. No dissenting votes.
FY2025 Budget: Unanimous approval, with praise from Council Members Laurano, Vicki Gillis, and Brannon Hampton for transparency, fiscal conservatism, and strategic planning.
Project Details
Australia Parkway/Pebble Creek Parkway I-10 Interchange
- Case number: Not stated in transcript
- Applicant/Developer: City of Goodyear (internal CIP project)
- Location/Address: Australia Parkway and Pebble Creek Parkway at I-10 interchange
- APN: Not stated
- Current scope: Two lanes in each direction; proposed scope: three lanes in each direction, dual left turns to I-10, dedicated right turns in both directions
- Budget: Original $7.9M → Revised $12.4M (57% increase); low bid $10.8M + $1.6M design/permitting = $12.4M
- Timeline: Construction start June 2024, completion December 2025
- Changes from previous version: Night work requirement to meet schedule; increased traffic control costs due to construction moratoriums
D&D Trucking Facility
- Case number: Ordinance 2024-1610
- Applicant/Developer: Joseph Osborne (on behalf of D&D Trucking)
- Attorney: Not stated
- Location/Address: Approximately 5.6 acres east of the southeast corner of Elliot Road and Bullard Avenue
- APN: Not stated in transcript
- Current zoning: PAD with underlying I-1 (light industrial)
- Proposed zoning: I-2 (general industrial) with PAD overlay
- Density/Units/Square Footage: 69 parking spaces for company vehicles; asphalt surface
- Setbacks (modified): Front 25 ft (vs. 50 ft standard), sides 20 ft (vs. 30 ft standard), rear 50 ft (maintained)
- Intended use: Truck parking and logistics facility for D&D Trucking company vehicles (no overnight sleeping, no commercial truck stop operations)
Business License Ordinance
- Ordinance number: 2024-1608
- Title: Amendment to Article 8-7, Business Registration Permits
- Changes approved: (1) Conversion from registration to licensing program; (2) Removal of $5,000 casual-sales threshold; (3) Change of casual event days from 2 to 14; (4) Exemptions for homebased businesses; (5) Criminal penalties for unlicensed operators (Class 1 misdemeanor: up to $2,500 + surcharges, 3 years probation, 6 months jail)
- Effective date: To be determined (ordinance sent to drafting after amendment vote)
Fiscal Year 2025 Budget
- Resolution number: 2024-2379
- Total budget: $818.966 million
- Key CIP allocations: $4.5M (Australia Parkway carryover), Camelback Road, wastewater facility expansions
- General Fund contingency: $33 million
- Fire Department overtime budget: ~$2.4 million ongoing
- Police Department overtime budget: ~$2 million ongoing
- Revenue impacts: $5M loss from rental tax reduction (legislature); property tax correction (one-time) from Maricopa County
Vote Breakdown
Consent Agenda (Items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10): 7–0
- Yes: All present (Joe Pizzillo, Brannon Hampton, Wally Campbell, Laura Kaino, Vicki Gillis, Benita Beckles, Trey Terry)
- No: None
- Absences/Recusals: None
Australia Parkway Budget Amendment (Item 8): 7–0
- Yes: All present
- No: None
Business License Ordinance (Item 11, as amended): 7–0
- Yes: All present
- No: None
D&D Trucking Rezoning (Ordinance 2024-1610): 7–0
- Yes: All present
- No: None
Fiscal Year 2025 Tentative Budget (Resolution 2024-2379): 7–0
- Yes: All present
- No: None
Authorization of FY2025 Expenditures >$500,000: 7–0
- Yes: All present
- No: None
Excusals: Council Member Vicki Gillis was excused from the Community Facilities District meeting (5–0 vote, with Vicki Gillis recorded as not present at the start).
Outcome & Next Steps
Australia Parkway Interchange: Approved for construction start in June 2024, completion targeted December 2025. City Engineer Steve Certo and Senior Project Manager Logan Hop will coordinate with other CIP projects to maintain north-south traffic routing. Staff will notify council of any moratorium conflicts.
Business License Ordinance: Approved as amended (14-day casual event threshold, $5,000 threshold removed). Rok Massi will revise the ordinance language and resubmit for final adoption. Council directed staff to develop a separate, dedicated ordinance addressing sober living homes and group homes, incorporating input from Scott Daniels (Police) and Ashley Troyer (Fire), who have worked on the issue for five years.
D&D Trucking Rezoning: Approved. Parcel rezoned to I-2 with PAD overlay. No explicit truck-stop prohibition was added, but Laura Kaino noted that any future conversion would require design review and return to council. Staff may pursue stipulations in future phases if needed.
FY2025 Budget: Tentative budget adopted at $818.966 million. Public hearing scheduled for June 10, 2024, with final budget adoption to follow. Special meeting June 3, 2024 (date mentioned for next meeting). Property tax levy adoption scheduled for approximately June 24, 2024. Staff will finalize carryover timing and CIP project schedules in August.
Next City Council Meeting: June 3, 2024 (with possibility of executive session for legal advice and real property discussions regarding former city hall).
Controversies & Context
Sober Living Homes Enforcement Gap: The most significant controversy underlying the meeting was council's realization that the City of Goodyear has had a documented problem with unlicensed and fraudulent sober living homes since 2019, yet council was not systematically informed until the issue became public in news coverage. Wally Campbell stated she had been on council since 2011 and "never heard about any of this until it all blew up in the newspaper."
Two experts—Scott Daniels (Police Department) and Ashley Troyer (Fire Department)—have been working on sober living home regulation for five years but were not present at the May 20 meeting, despite the business licensing ordinance being explicitly tied to the sober living issue. Wally Campbell, Stipp, and Vicki Gillis expressed frustration that these experts were not invited to testify or advise. Vicki Gillis stated: "I think we need to have Ashley and Scott here so they can add to the conversations…we should have them at these meetings."
Wally Campbell raised specific concerns:
- Insufficient penalties: $250 per day is characterized as a "cost of doing business" for operators generating "hundreds of thousands of dollars a month."
- Resident expulsion: Bad actors are expelling residents into homelessness without providing alternative placement, creating a spillover crisis.
- Licensing vs. enforcement: Unlicensed operators, by definition, will not come forward to obtain a business license, so the new ordinance is reactive rather than proactive.
- Inadequate state oversight: State agencies do not sufficiently regulate or prosecute fraudulent sober living home operators.
- Comparative analysis: Glendale, Gilbert, and Surprise have stronger ordinances and enforcement mechanisms.
Council Member Stipp agreed that "this is not a sober living home ordinance" and that "the whole conversation needs to kind of stop on this topic right here," but he also supported Wally Campbell call for a separate ordinance. Joe Pizzillo noted that the Attorney General's office has prosecuted some sober living home operators, suggesting a state-level enforcement component is needed alongside local regulation.
Construction Cost Escalation: Council Member Stipp highlighted the Australia Parkway project as symptomatic of a broader fiscal challenge. ADOT has documented 55% construction cost increases since 2021. Scottsdale and Phoenix have experienced 50–60% increases. The city's prior cost estimates were materially off, leading to a 57% budget increase on a $7.9M project. Stipp charged that "when we got into this pinch a number of years ago um that we were under bidding the scope was right we were our cost estimates were way off." He noted that this experience must inform future CIP estimates and that cost-estimation discipline is essential to avoid repeated surprises.
Legislative Revenue Erosion: The state legislature has continued to cut municipal revenues. Goodyear faced a $5M loss from rental tax reduction (among the lowest percentage hits of any Arizona city). Joe Pizzillo noted that 74 Arizona cities experienced $234M in combined cuts. The loss of rental tax revenue forces the city to convert one-time program funding to ongoing general fund commitments, a structural squeeze that will compound in future fiscal years.
MAG Arterial Funding Trade-Off: Brannon Hampton reminded the public of a decades-old decision: in the early 2000s, Goodyear relinquished access to MAG (Maricopa Association of Governments) arterial funding to enable ADOT's I-10 widening through the city. Proposition 479, to be voted on in November 2024, would restore Goodyear's access to arterial funding if approved by voters. Brannon Hampton stated: "we gave up our money our access to arterial money through the…remaining life of proposition 400" to fund I-10 widening, and that Goodyear is now "back in the game" if Prop 479 passes. This context underscores why Australia Parkway improvements are fully funded by the city without external grant assistance.
Campaign Sign Enforcement: Council Members Stipp and Vicki Gillis raised concerns about political campaign signs being placed improperly in city rights-of-way and ADOT property. Massi clarified that the city can only remove signs in city rights-of-way if they are unsafe or blocking views, and only after providing 24 hours' notice (typically more). ADOT-controlled rights-of-way are ADOT's responsibility, though the city clerk's office will pass complaints to ADOT. Vicki Gillis noted that some candidates "seem to think they can just go above and beyond" and requested a single standard applied to all candidates. Massi agreed that the city has adopted a sign-free zone in its GSQ district, which the city can enforce.
Public Safety Recognition: Joe Pizzillo and the City Manager acknowledged several awards: Human Resources received the Industrial Commission of Arizona Chairman's Award for safety and well-being; Water Services Director Barbara Chapel received the Water Environment Federation 2024 Hatfield Award for leadership and integrity; the Wastewater Collection Division received a water safety award; and the Fleet Division was recognized for the fourth consecutive year as one of the top 50 government fleets in the nation.
Desert Gunfire and Public Safety: Council Member Laurano raised an ongoing concern about weekend gunfire in the desert areas of Australia (the neighborhood), including what sounded like "automatic gunfire" approximately one week prior. She expressed worry that hikers and dog walkers might be endangered. The Police Chief acknowledged that discharging firearms in unincorporated desert areas is illegal and committed to increasing officer visibility in the area, though proactive patrols are difficult in the river bottoms.
Duration
- Australia Parkway Item (Item 8): Approximately 30 minutes (presentation + council discussion)
- Business License Ordinance (Item 11): Approximately 60 minutes (extended discussion of casual sales threshold, sober living homes, criminal penalties, and amendments)
- Truck Parking Rezoning: Approximately 20 minutes (presentation + council questions)
- Budget Presentation & Discussion: Approximately 45 minutes (presentation + council questions)
- Total meeting duration: Approximately 3.5–4 hours (including CFD meeting prior to city council)
Other Notable Items
Public Comment (Non-Agenda): Jeff Redmond, an Australia resident, commented on the general plan approval, requesting: (1) consideration of airport expansion flight patterns and noise, (2) nighttime road work to minimize daytime traffic disruption, and (3) expansion of notified notification radius beyond 500 feet for proposed land uses. He cited his near-miss of a storage unit development proposal because he lived outside the 500-foot notification zone despite having clear visual sightlines. Joe Pizzillo noted the comments would be forwarded to the City Manager and that planning and zoning matters could be addressed at future Planning and Zoning Commission meetings. William Miller, a second public commenter, thanked council for installing a traffic light on Australia Parkway, noting that his grandmother now feels safer crossing the street.
Industrial Commission of Arizona Award: The city's Human Resources department was honored with the Chairman's Award for excellence in workplace safety, supported by Parks and Recreation, Public Works, and Water Services personnel.